As I wrote, "lets accept for the sake of argument here that Article V Conventions, instead of Scotus decisions, actually did these horrid things to the Constitution from the mid-20th to early 21st centuries. If conventions proposed these disgraces as formal amendments to the Constitution, at least wed know they were Constitutional. As the product of Article V Conventions, they are all subject to possible correction by future Conventions. Not so today. Scotus amendments are beyond the electoral reach of the people. We are at best the subjects of Scotus, and at worst, its slaves."
Id rather live in a screwed-up republic screwed up by the sovereign people than be a slave to five lawyers in a phony republic in which the people are too timid and beaten down to take peaceful measures to save themselves and their posterity
VERY WELL said!