Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sean_Anthony

You may read it as because states have armies, you need a weapon to defend yourself against the state.


3 posted on 03/23/2019 12:52:54 PM PDT by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rey

That is exactly what they meant.


7 posted on 03/23/2019 1:00:48 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rey

Yes, recognizing that armies exist apart from people, the future would always pose a risk that such armies could be used against a free people, hence the people must have a right apart from government to hold arms.

It is a check against tyranny.


8 posted on 03/23/2019 1:05:20 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rey

“you need a weapon to defend yourself against the state.”

And don’t give me that old crapola re “automatic weapon” were never conceived by the founders !

Worse than that,they NEVER knew about NATIONWIDE newspapers, radio or TV ! Those are worse for the nation than Browning’s inventions ..Maybe radio and TV should be regulated to reach only 5 MILES, — Sound reasonable ?

If their argument works for guns, why not Radio and TV ?


10 posted on 03/23/2019 1:10:06 PM PDT by litehaus (A memory toooo long.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson