Posted on 03/29/2019 2:02:05 PM PDT by Starman417
It's never a good week for The Radical Left when learning that a hoax whose goal was to stoke racial division has ties to their Messiah is not even their worst news. "Wait a minute Brother Bob", some of you more astute readers may be saying, "Wasn't it just last summer you were telling us about The Month that We Learned that Democrats Are Horrible People Who Hate America? Why yes I did! And kudos for paying attention! But unlike last year's post where I cited several events that led me to that conclusion, this post relates to one single event.
The big story of the last week was the Meuller Report, or more accurately, what even the radicals at CNN confessed was "A big nothingburger" when they thought they were speaking privately. What was worse was how both the perpetrators and the dupes of this hoax have reacted in the aftermath. While one might expect apologies or some form of contrition, most of you know that Being a Leftist Means never having to Say You’re Sorry. Instead we've seen the predictable denial, rage, and lashing out, rather than looking inward as to how they were duped by their latest God That Failed. But aside from this being the latest apocalyptic world ending outrage that Lefties seem to cook up every month, what is it that makes this one stand out?
Before I go any further I have to disclose that as this post was kicking around in my head, Timcast posted a video that partially beat me to this idea. His idea is just different enough to warrant the click through, though. To get to the point, the most disturbing part of the conclusion of Russiagate is that The Radical Left showed how much they truly hate America. While that sounds like hyperbole, let's break this story down to its most basic elements:
(Excerpt) Read more at Floppingaces.net...
Only the Spaniards who’ve abandoned zoo animals to starve come close to being this crass and just plain bad.
“I knew that back in the ‘70s.”
Me too, specifically when Carter threatened to pull all of our troops out of South Korea, because of the ‘human rights’ situation there. The fact that EVERYONE knew that the North, who were very strong then, would march right into Seoul didn’t even matter to him.
So my question is why did we have to suffer through the learning curves of Ted Cruz, Mark Levin, and others, as they slowly got the idea that Hillary is not a ‘saint’?
This week? Really?
I’ve know. It since the 60’s...
Headline is wrong. WE? LEARNED? Everyone on FR has known this. And leftists are incapable of LEARNING this. The best we can say is that this week EVEN MORE PEOPLE learned the Democrats are horrible.
Slow learner.
Still a near majority that can’t see the forest for the trees.
I learned this years ago, but if people didn’t figure this out the week they were screaming and digging their nails into the doors because they were convinced a young teen was a violent rapist - because 30 years ago a girl said he jumped on her on a bed, but she can’t remember who was there or where it was or when it happened - and never filed police charges and STILL won’t -
And then the entire apparatus of the Democrat party came down on this decent family man, with the media -
well, then they are hopeless. They could look in the face of Hitler himself and not get what evil or bad character was.
For me: any week starting in 1965.
Are you thinking of Tom Foley?
The Democrats’ Creed ---what they really believe (hat tip Michael Kelly)
Democrats believe President Bill Clinton. And have always believed him. Democrats believed it when Clinton said he had never been drafted in the Vietnam War and believed him later when Clinton said he had merely “forgotten to mention” that he had been drafted in the Vietnam War.
Democrats believed him when Clinton he said he hadn’t had sex with Gennifer Flowers and believed him later, when Clinton reportedly said he did bed her down.
Democrats believed the president did not rent out the Lincoln Bedroom to celebrities, did not sell access to himself and the vice president to hundreds of well-heeled special pleaders and did not supervise the largest, most systematic money-laundering operation in campaign finance history, collecting more than $ 3 million in illegal and improper donations.
Democrats believe that Charlie Trie and James Riady were motivated by nothing but patriotism for their adopted country.
Democrats believed President Clinton when he conceded that his administration mistakenly obtained the FBI files of more than 300 people, including many top Republicans and believes it was the result of a “completely honest bureaucratic snafu” involving security clearances.
Democrats believed Clinton’s chief of staff, Leon Panetta, when he told reporters that “obviously a mistake was made” and apologized to the people whose FBI files wound up at the White House. Democrats believed Clinton when he said “I completely support” what my COS Panetta said about the affair.
Democrats believed Vice President Gore when he said that he had made dunning calls to political contributors “on a few occasions” from his White House office, and believed him when he said that, actually, “a few” meant 46.
Democrats devoutly believe in "no controlling legal authority"....but not for Nixon or Trump.
Democrats believed Bruce Babbitt when he said that the $286,000 contributed to the DNC by Indian tribes opposed to granting a casino license to rival tribes had nothing to do with his denial of the license. Democrats believed the secretary when he said that he had not been instructed in this matter by then-White House deputy chief of staff Harold Ickes.
Democrats believed him when he said later that he had told lobbyist and friend Paul Eckstein that Ickes had told him to move on the casino decision, but that he had been lying to Eckstein. Democrats agreed with the secretary that it is an outrage that anyone would question his integrity.
Democrats firmly believe in the “Clinton Standard” of adherence to the nation’s campaign finance and bribery laws, enunciated by the president on March 7, 1997: “I don’t believe you can find any evidence of the fact that I had changed government policy solely because of a contribution.” Democrats noted with approval the use of the word “evidence” and also the use of the word “solely.” Democrats devoutly believe, as Clinton does, that it is proper to change government policy to address the concerns of people who have"given the president money, as long as nobody can find "evidence" of this being the "sole" reason.
Democrats believe president Clinton lived up to his promise to preside over the most ethical administration in American history that indicted former agriculture secretary Mike Espy did not accept $35,000 in illegal favors from Tyson Foods and other regulated businesses.
Democrats believe that indicted former housing secretary Henry Cisneros did not lie to the FBI and tell others to lie to cover up $250,000 in blackmail payments to his former mistress.
Democrats believe that convicted former associate attorney general Webster Hubbell was not involved in the obstruction of justice when the president’s minions arranged for Hubbell to receive $ 400,000 in sweetheart consulting deals at a time when he was reneging on his promise to cooperate with Kenneth Starr’s Whitewater investigation.
Democrats believe, as Harvey Weinstein does, that Paula Jones is a cheap tramp who was asking for it, that Kathleen Willey is a cheap tramp who was asking for it, and that Monica Lewinsky is a cheap tramp who was asking for it.
Democrats firmly believe Monica Lewinsky was “just fantasizing” in her 20 hours of taped conversation in which she reportedly detailed her sexual relationship with the president and begged Linda Tripp to join her in lying about the relationship and that any gifts, correspondence, telephone calls and the 37 post-employment White House visits that may have passed between Lewinsky and the president are evidence only of a platonic relationship. Journos believe that such innocent intimate friendships are quite common between middle-aged married men and young single women, and also between presidents of the United States and White House interns.
Democrats see nothing suspicious in the report that the president’s intimate pal, Vernon Jordan, arranged a $40,000-per-year job for Lewinsky shortly after she signed but before she filed an affidavit saying she had not had sex with the president.
Nor did Democrats read anything significant into the fact that the ambassador to the United Nations, Bill Richardson, visited Lewinsky at the Watergate to offer her a job.
Democrat believe the instructions Lewinsky gave Linda Tripp informing her on how to properly perjure herself in the Willey matter simply wrote themselves.
Democrats believe, as does Hillary, that The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, Newsweek, Time, U.S. News & World Report, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS and NPR are all part of a vast right-wing conspiracy to malign the saintly Clintons.
Possible. They were both full of crap Leftists at any rate. Be fun to look on if they could see the insanity and wickedness of their party now.
Last I heard of Foley was a story about him being seen pocketing the silverware after an in flight meal.
I watched the fire start in the ‘60s....I imagine you did too.
Yes I did. I didn’t like it then, I like it less now.
Same - we had no idea of where it was all going, and now the nightmare has become reality.
Remember when one of the first state dinners held by Trump may have been served on china the Clintons had tried to steal but had to return?
I used to think politically the USA had a male and a female 2 party system, Republican and Democrat wings of the uni-party - a marriage made in hell. I was wrong, the Republican are not the masculine male “Daddy” party. Quite the opposite, the Democrats are the bully wife beater party and the GOP is the passive feminine party with battered wife syndrome.
Yeah, I think DJT made a point of that.
But I am open to arguments for earlier.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.