Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RArtfulogerDodger

It’s possible. The “T’s” believe that it’s transphobic for straight guys to discriminate in their dating preferences against “transwomen” (biological males who identify as women). Putting aside whether it’s even possible for a man to become a woman via surgery and hormone treatment, to qualify as a transwoman requires nothing more than to “identify” as a woman; there is no requirement there be any physiological basis to that claim.

Following that to its logical conclusion, in order for a straight guy to “prove” that he’s not “transphobic”, he would need to have sex with a transwomen at least once. And if there’s evidence that he’s otherwise willing to have sex with women generally whenever the opportunity presents itself, then he may have to have sex with transwomen repeatedly in order to establish his nondiscriminatory bonafides.

To put it another way, in the future, any man who refuses the sexual advances of a transwoman will be considered transphobic, a form of bigotry akin to racism, which is against the law in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Needless to say, in my book, regardless of the “plumbing”, a man cannot have anything other than gay sex with a transwoman. Thus in the future, gay sex will be required.


18 posted on 09/12/2019 4:07:23 PM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Behind the Blue Wall

Yew broke tha’ code :)


25 posted on 09/12/2019 4:34:51 PM PDT by RArtfulogerDodger (peace, Love, and Joy To All, Especially Obama and Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson