“credible accusations of child trafficking and abuse”
If they’re credible, that means you have actual evidence, right.
Have you taken this evidence to the police?
“Have you taken this evidence to the police?”
Have you submitted yourself to a psychiatric evaluation?
We have open crimes being committed nonstop by Obama, Hillary, et al. Clintons flying to Epstein’s private island. Benghazi. Weaponizing IRS against conservatives. Fast and Furious. Circumvention of immigration law. Voter fraud. Hillary’s using a personal email server for what she knew was classified intelligence and she knew was a serious crime. Do you think that evidence did not exist? Do you think my limited access to it means it did not exist? Do you think it was somehow my job to take it to the police or therefore I am not allowed to point the finger at them for their crimes?
That is one of the nuttiest arguments I’ve ever heard on this forum, and I’ve heard a lot.
Sound like someone who needs to take his meds.
Maybe the Center for Medical Progress should just take their evidence to the police for Planned Parenthood killing live babies after they are born by harvesting their organs to sell? Maybe you think those are fake videos too?
Maybe the police will just drive over to PP and round up the criminals on those videos and take them straight to jail, and then they can swing by and pick up the Clintons, after showing the Secret Service the videos that expose them, right? And then they’ll go to jail, and we will all live happily ever after? I can see it right now. You should sell your story idea to Disney.
I see you continue to ignore mountains of evidence to further your agenda which includes the defense of the Clintons and Podestas.
The only credibility question here is why anyone on this forum should consider you credible. No one on this forum agrees with you accept that prostitution defender who you seem to get along with so well.