The accused is not being allowed to face his accuser (the whistleblower).
The accused is not being charged with any actual crimes.
The only “evidence” is hearsay.
The standard of proof is unknown.
I am amazed that this legal proceeding is allowed at all. This is right out of Kafka.
Schiff refuses to release the transcript from the testimony of Michael Atkinson, probably because it reveals the whistleblower's name and disproves other statements Schiff has been making. How can you have a "fair trial" when the prosecution is allowed to suppress exculpatory evidence?