Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wife sparks a lively debate on whether it’s sexier for a man to ‘provide or go 50/50' - and the majority of women argue it’s ‘unattractive’ for husbands not to financially support them
UK Daily Mail ^ | March 3, 2020 | Jessica Rach

Posted on 03/03/2020 8:14:29 AM PST by C19fan

A woman has sparked a lively debate online after running a poll on whether women think it's 'sexier' for their partner to be the financial breadwinner, or split the bills with them.

Juliana Stewart, from London, who has been married a year, took to her Twitter account @JulianaStewart_ to ask other women whether they preferred a traditional or modern approach to relationships.

She wrote: 'Ladies, what's sexier?

'A 50/50 relationship is when you split the bills, date nights, holidays, living arrangements, everything. A man who provides means you can work if you want to but don't have to, he knows how to hold it down.'

And while followers replied with mixed responses, the surprising poll results showed that 63 per cent of women out of the 4,000 asked preferred a 'man who provides'.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: hypergamy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
showed that 63 per cent of women out of the 4,000 asked preferred a 'man who provides'.

The 37% on the other side are lying.

1 posted on 03/03/2020 8:14:29 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Another approach is to regard 100% of the money as ‘ours’. Then it does not matter whose account it comes from.


2 posted on 03/03/2020 8:18:14 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Well, there is that little issue of who works to pay the bills when the woman is in a forced dependency role late in pregnancy and early child care


3 posted on 03/03/2020 8:19:55 AM PST by HangnJudge (Kipling was right about humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

What’s hers is hers. What’s his is ours.
If folks haven’t figured that out yet, they are headed for divorce.


4 posted on 03/03/2020 8:20:59 AM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

6 years after my divorce, my ex called and wanted me to buy her a new iphone.
LOL like that is going to happen.


5 posted on 03/03/2020 8:22:04 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

...Another approach is to regard 100% of the money as ‘ours’

I just assume I don’t own anything, it’s all hers; it’s more peaceful that way


6 posted on 03/03/2020 8:22:17 AM PST by HangnJudge (Kipling was right about humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunTzuWu
What’s hers is hers. What’s his is ours.
If folks haven’t figured that out yet, they are headed for divorce.

Where the point will be reinforced by the court during property reallocation.

7 posted on 03/03/2020 8:23:10 AM PST by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Yes...if you don’t treat all funds as “ours”...you start your marriage on a downhill ride...imho


8 posted on 03/03/2020 8:23:23 AM PST by goodnesswins (Want to know your family genealogy? Run for political office...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I would say there’s a distinctive difference between expecting you support her, and she being appreciative of your support and doing everything she can to contribute to the overall household as well. You’re a team with different strengths in different areas. Act like it, embrace it, respect it.


9 posted on 03/03/2020 8:26:06 AM PST by BBQToadRibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

No doubt most of the 37% are lying. But many women have been marinated in the liberal nonsense so I bet 5-10% sincerely belive a 50/50 split is better.

But most of those will still be dissatsified.


10 posted on 03/03/2020 8:27:20 AM PST by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

many woman today want “feminism” when it suits them, and traditional gender roles the rest of the time.


11 posted on 03/03/2020 8:27:30 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

50/50 shows lack of commitment. The two are not becoming one.

It’s weird and not a real marriage.


12 posted on 03/03/2020 8:29:03 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

I can top that. Several years after divorce, my ex wanted to meet me for lunch to discuss “finances”. At that point, he owed me several thousand dollars in back child support and kids’ expenses, and did not seem that he was going to start reducing that, any time soon. He was earning about 180% of my income, and the child support was under $300/month for 2 kids.

He wanted me to refinance the house, and then loan him the money/cash I got out of it, and he would use that money to pay me the backlog he owed.

Yes... he thought I was dumb enough to do this. But he was wrong.


13 posted on 03/03/2020 8:29:40 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

There goes that equality thing.


14 posted on 03/03/2020 8:29:44 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (Epstein pulled a Carradine, the bozo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

“6 years after my divorce, my ex called and wanted me to buy her a new iphone.”

Did you leave her or she leave you?


15 posted on 03/03/2020 8:29:47 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

16 posted on 03/03/2020 8:31:04 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras
6 years after my divorce, my ex called and wanted me to buy her a new iphone. LOL like that is going to happen.

Being a pragmatist, I would assess potential benefits versus cost...
17 posted on 03/03/2020 8:31:44 AM PST by farming pharmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

“Yes...if you don’t treat all funds as “ours”...you start your marriage on a downhill ride...imho”

Yes. It’s not really a marriage.

In marriage everything the man earns is for his family.

That’s just how it is and if a man doesn’t believe that or understand that he’s not a man and should not be getting married or have kids.


18 posted on 03/03/2020 8:32:51 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Another approach is to regard 100% of the money as ‘ours’. Then it does not matter whose account it comes from.
___________________________
This is the obvious, common sense answer in a marriage. Now, it gets more interesting in a non-married situation.


19 posted on 03/03/2020 8:32:54 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

We’z all equalz untilz you don’t gibzmedat!


20 posted on 03/03/2020 8:34:07 AM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson