Posted on 10/19/2020 4:21:55 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
Justice Roberts screws Republicans again, by refusing to issue a stay to the absurd Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that allows counting ballots received AFTER election day. This also hypocritically contradicts Roberts' other rulings on ballot access. https://t.co/d96gvVE3O7— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) October 19, 2020
THis is exactly what I have been claiming for over five years now.Roberts is and has been compromised for some time.He illegally smuggled his adopted kids in the U.S. and during the decision to kill or save zero care he was busted by the cabal.
He’s been compromised ever since.
ON small issues he can vote conservative but anything big he is owned by all the wrong criminals.
His siding with the hard left is no surprise,lets just be glad we will get Amy on the court not a moment too soon either.
He’s not a liberal and never has been. What he is is wholly owned by the cabal.
I admit, I did too.
You knew Roberts was going to do that [screw us at every opportunity] Why are you surprised? Roberts is working for the other side full time. If Biden gets in, and there is a good chance he will, it will be because of bastards like Roberts.
“postmarked on or before Election Day?”
I read that ballots without clear postmarks will be counted.
PA is gone.
Roberts is a sexual pervert. Probably a pedophile or gay or both.
That’s what they have on him.
Actually it is the second.
After Amy is seated can it be appealed to the SC or do you get one shot at it?.
Sigh. No. No they won’t.
Already the GOP has stifled 10/11 of these.
Only NC and WI remain.
This wasn’t a precedent-setting ruling. It was a “return” to the previous court.
The decision can and will be appealed, but the PA GOP moved this forward TOO FAST. They should have stalled for a friggin’ week. At any rate, they will go back before a court with ACB on it and will win.
The Court is not going to RULE on these piecemeal. If it is going to have to rule on making a vote counting standard, it will do so on the merits of ALL of these cases at once.
Finally, if you want an analysis of what this would mean even if allowed to stand (wouldn’t mean much), go here: https://twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/1318353971023548419
Roberts and his wife were unable to have kids before he was picked by GW for the bench. His mother in law suggested they adopt a blonde headed blue eyed girl and boy from the home county of cork,Ireland.Patently illegal according to Irish law.
Roberts found the birth parents of both children and took the entire entourage to Central America. I'm not sure of the country. He then adopted both children from Central America to the U.S. as if they were of Central American origin. Also very illegal but money talks all over Central and South America.
Things went well for some years until Bush picked him for the Supreme court. At that time the NYT did a standard bio of the entire family.
Here's where it gets sticky.
I think they figured out what he did. Anyway they stopped short of any accusations in the piece if it's still on the web which I doubt. Since I started looking into this over five years ago most if not all of my source material has disappeared into the vast world of 404.
So Roberts dodges an initial bullet that we know about.Obama sends the obamacare bill up to the supremes to judge whether its legal or a POS which it is and always was.
At first Roberts had written the "against" possibly collaborating with his close friend Scalia.
All of a sudden Roberts discovers that the affordable care bill is really nothing more than a tax.
(later Roberts claimed he made it a tax so any potus could get rid of it with ease)no one bought it and last I heard its still around in pieces.
For the next month or so Scalia tried his best to find out why Roberts had such an overnight change of heart and was now ready to legalize such and insane bill as obamcare. Roberts avoided or put Scalia off for a month and finally obamcare passed 5/4 in the Supreme court.
My best guess is that at the time ozero had been using the super computer named the HAMR previously designed to chase down terrorists but revamped to be used on US citizens by ozero.He probably used it on Roberts to find out every and any little detail f the guys life.The NYT article had to come up.Was it enough to lead to the illegal adoption of his kids or did they find it out some other way,really doesn't matter best guess is they figured out what he did and he was instantly blackmailed for life without even thinking about it.
At first I hadn't figured out that Roberts could have been compromised even further by taking money from the cabal which is an automatic to make sure valued assets stay in the fold courtesy of a photo of Roberts getting out of a car on an island famous for financial transactions can't recall which one.So now it looks like he's a full circle criminal.
That's what I have so far.
..........................
Seems I'm not alone any more:
http://www.project.nsearch.com/profiles/blogs/proof-roberts-blackmailed-on-adoption-to-pass-obamacare
Roberts Blackmailed For Vote On ObamaCare! from Truth Warriors on Vimeo.
See why everybody needs APeX - Anti Pathogen Extreme, Anti Viral, Anti Bacterial , Humic at www.BestHumicFulvic.com and Josh Bernstein put out an interesting program on Supreme Court Justice John Roberts being bribed to vote for ObamaCare involving the special treatment given on his adoption of his two children. Josh claims Obama, Brennan and Clapper blackmailed Judge Roberts in order to get his vote on ObamaCare. Many people have thought somebody had leverage on Roberts and that's why he voted the way he did. Whistleblowers are coming out now with proof of illegal wiretapping by the Obama administration and it appears Judge Roberts is one of those who was illegally surveilled!
In Wikileaks Vault 7 there are communications involving John Roberts. We didn't know what Roberts was threatened with at the time but now we have a very good idea what made him changed his vote! A whistleblower has come forward and said John Brennan and James Clapper hacked FISA Court Judge and John Roberts! What they found gave them leverage over Roberts and this is why he changed his vote!
John and his wife Jane had trouble conceiving children and after 4 or 5 years so they decided to adopt. They ended up adopting two beautiful blonde children from Ireland. They decided to do a private adoption which means they were privileged and had special access through arranged people to gain access to children that most of us would not be able to do. They did this adoption without oversight of any official adoption agencies! The country of Ireland does not allow private out of country adoptions. Therefore these adoptions might not have been legal in the United States but they were definitely illegal in Ireland!
Obama knew this and so did the New York Times who was about to write a scathing article about the Judge Roberts adoption! Obama stopped the article and the rest of the media from reporting on this because he wanted Roberts' vote on ObamaCare!
During the video a very interesting audio file is played where billionaire Tim Blixseth explains the hacking of a FISA judge and also Supreme Court Justice John Roberts! Now we know how they got ObamaCare passed!,p> Judge Roberts must now be exposed for what he's done and must come clean about how he was blackmailed! Get this article everywhere and tweet to Trump @potus and @realdonaldtrump and let's cause some chaos out there! Good luck with any traction on any of this I doubt it ever happens.
Bingo you can pass go,get an iou and wait forever for justice.
I doubt it,see my posts.
Thanks Larry!
Trump should impound all US mail in processing at midnight on November 3rd.
Great post Larry you rock.!
There’s little doubt that the Deep State is in possession of videos of Roberts from when he was on Epstein Island.
He has a satelite office on Malta
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.