To: SeekAndFind
The wife and I voted for Prop 22. The only proposition we voted for. All the others we voted NO on.
To: SeekAndFind
The death rattle of the private-sector unions can still hurt in the right places - commie California is one of those places.
3 posted on
10/23/2020 11:02:21 AM PDT by
NohSpinZone
(First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
To: SeekAndFind
As the article noted, Uber and Lyft provide a great public service. Instead of drinking and driving, many young people will drink, then call Uber or Lyft.
So naturally CAs liberal elite tries to interfere with that. The Nanny State always thinks it knows better. And it is always wrong.
4 posted on
10/23/2020 11:04:58 AM PDT by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: SeekAndFind
“rideshare and delivery drivers who wish to remain independent”
Comrades! Follow the directives of your maximum leader, Newsome! Independence from the collective is bad! No to critical thinking! We will think for you! Love Big Brother!
Now, go back to hating orangeman.
5 posted on
10/23/2020 11:05:46 AM PDT by
dynachrome
(The panic will end, the tyranny will not)
To: SeekAndFind
No sympathy for these Gig companies. They got into bed with Democrats and the Left and now they caught a STD.
6 posted on
10/23/2020 11:05:52 AM PDT by
C19fan
To: SeekAndFind
Prop 22 made it on the November ballot, and have spent over $190 million in education and advertisingGood gawd...it was not that long ago $190 MM was the amount a POTUS campaign would spend.
7 posted on
10/23/2020 11:07:03 AM PDT by
C19fan
To: SeekAndFind
The crazy thing is, libs use it the most. A lot of young libs never learned to drive, they dont own cars and use Uber for everything. Then they vote for the idiots who drafted this law.
8 posted on
10/23/2020 11:08:30 AM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
To: SeekAndFind
9 posted on
10/23/2020 11:09:10 AM PDT by
GOP Poet
To: SeekAndFind
I thought this affected every type of contract work not protected under interstate commerce oversight (that’s commercial trucking)
IT specialists, caterers, etc.
all I ever see is stories about Lyft and Uber.
Again, besides killing the app-based economy, this will kill the gig-based economy.
Collateral damage.
11 posted on
10/23/2020 11:17:48 AM PDT by
Strident
(< null >)
To: SeekAndFind
Very little sympathy for Uber and Lyft. As employees or contractors or whatever they wanna call it, they should be paying appropriate commercial insurance, etc.
12 posted on
10/23/2020 11:20:32 AM PDT by
Reno89519
(Buy American, Hire American! End All Worker Visa Programs. Replace Visa Workers w/ American Workers)
To: SeekAndFind
I think it’s going to win big as there are many, many “independent contractors” in California that will benefit when Prop 22 passes for Lyft and Uber.
13 posted on
10/23/2020 11:22:45 AM PDT by
glennaro
(Know that a muzzle is a symbol of subservience, of self-degradation and, most tragically, of fear.)
To: SeekAndFind
cab companies last I looked had to carry 1Million dollars in liability ins per cab. Dispatch logs can be used to verify income, tips excepted. Drivers are routinely randomly drug tested and FBI-background checked processed by the local PD. Their meters and vehicles are inspected once a year for accuracy/safety. How does that compare to uber/lyft?
I’ve also seen the complaint that the uber/lyft drivers want paid sick leave, vacation and medical. Although most work less than 20 hours a week and work for more than one vendor. I don’t see how that works out logistically for the companies. If a driver works 6 hours a week, how much sick leave or vacation time would they actually accrue, compared to say, office workers? Who pays the medical? If companies are supposed to provide that, and the drivers drive for 2 or 3 companies, how is that shared out?
I see the emotional arguments but not much red meat. So for me, I haven’t decided yes or no yet.
15 posted on
10/23/2020 11:35:58 AM PDT by
blueplum
("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017))
To: SeekAndFind
I'm voting no for these reasons:
- The entire law needs to be repealed as it is a power grab for California against the labor market and is designed to empower labor unions.
- It destroys independent musicians, artists, and contractors and forces them to give the rights to their works to large corporations.
- Communism uses Corporatism as a means of controlling commerce via government owned corporate monopolies. This law is a big step in that direction.
- Uber and Lift are both guilty of deceptive trade practices and violation of consumer privacy. They also encourage Marxist thought via their stance on social justice issues and use their apps as a way to push those platforms.
- Uber and Lift do not disclose the level of liability to their drivers and uses this ignorance as a means to push their service. Once a driver gets into an accident and realizes their insurance does not cover it, they have no recourse. Uber and Lift both have a due diligence to disclose the liability risks drivers assume when signing up to provide service.
- Uber (especially) and Lift are supporters of the Democrat party and donate money to their causes; let them reap the rewards (/s) of this relationship.
17 posted on
10/23/2020 11:46:24 AM PDT by
Intar
To: SeekAndFind
19 posted on
10/23/2020 11:48:46 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: SeekAndFind
Yes on 22.
No on everything else.
Recall Newsolini.
23 posted on
10/23/2020 12:01:03 PM PDT by
Pajamajan
( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson