Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: NobleFree

Can’t they claim in their defense that they’re not truly a “state actor” since they only act on the wishes of one political party?


4 posted on 05/17/2021 10:33:35 AM PDT by GMMC0987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GMMC0987
Can’t they claim in their defense that they’re not truly a “state actor” since they only act on the wishes of one political party?

May Twitter and all these Leftist Propaganda social media outlets rue the day they began making illegal political contributions-in-kind to the Democrat agenda. They declared themselves to be content providers, and not content carriers as per Section 230.

14 posted on 05/17/2021 10:41:32 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: GMMC0987

Big Tech has some very clever attorneys, that’s for sure, who know the ways around the law better than the regulators. Still, this is our best shot. Trump was barred from blocking troll followers on his twitter account because that was deemed “viewpoint discrimination”. Applying the same standard (I know, good luck, right) would suggest Dr. Shiva just can’t be banned by twitter. But again, the opposition has the tech, the lawyers, $$, everything.


17 posted on 05/17/2021 10:46:14 AM PDT by TimSkalaBim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson