Replies

Not being a lawyer, I may be incorrect on this but:

If Giuliani is accused of making false statement, would the court not have to prove they are in fact false? Conversely, if Giuliani can prove they are true, then would that not negate the decision?

It seems that if played correctly, Giuliani might have his day in court to present evidence of the fraudulent aspects in multiple states.

That’s how it should work but I. Reality, it goes like this

If you are a republican/conservative/MAGA supporter, you are guilty and that is that, because the left says so, that’s why.

If you are a liberal lawyer, meh no worries, no charges

RE: If Giuliani is accused of making false statement, would the court not have to prove they are in fact false? Conversely, if Giuliani can prove they are true, then would that not negate the decision?

That is why the court made a PREMATURE decision ( in fact I would call it a POLITICAL decision not based on the merits.

In the past week alone we learned:

Significant election irregularities have been exposed in Georgia.
A November memo from a contractor hired to observe the election documents “massive” election integrity problems in Atlanta.
Georgia officials conducted a secret investigation of tainted ballots.
A whistleblower has come forward about a Mark Zuckerberg-funded group that “seized control” of the election in Wisconsin.
There were 33,000 undervotes in Maricopa County, Arizona, when county officials only recorded 8,475.

So, before we even account for the plethora of affidavits, evidence, statistical anomalies, or even the illegally changed election laws in various states, we’ve had enough revelations in the past week that prove Rudy Giuliani wasn’t “communicat[ing] demonstrably false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers and the public at large.”

The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s order likely won’t stand, but it proves the incredible efforts of the radical left to silence those who question the results of the 2020 election.

It seems that if played correctly, Giuliani might have his day in court to present evidence of the fraudulent aspects in multiple states.

He will never be allowed to present the evidence in court. Rather, the court will just repeat the media spin that this has all been disproven.