Posted on 07/26/2021 8:20:04 AM PDT by USA Conservative
Was the assault and riot at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6 an elaborate plot by nefarious globalists using a tiny cadre of paid actors to create a scenario to cast President Donald Trump in a bad light? Or were the real inciters the legislators inside the building who were working to certify the presidential election?
Maybe on some questions, we will never get an answer!
Donald Trump ally Pastor Darrell Scott has claimed recent reports revealing that the Capitol Police were told to hold off on their response to the January 6 attack is proof that the riot was a “set up” for Trump take the blame for it.
However, some fact-checkers denied these allegations as not real but another so-called conspiracy surfaced.
News that broke out this morning alleges that some mainstream media published news about rioters breaching the Capitol three hours before it happened.
Images below:
The social media post was published by thousand of accounts so our team decided to take a closer look at what really happened.
It seems that there was an article that was published in the morning but, it was later updated with a different headline:
Here are the after and before:
Our team is always looking for the truth no matter what and people should always double-check before the post content online, the mainstream media is not the only one who produces fake news these days!
Note also that they reported Sicknick’s death before it happened, which suggests that he could have been murdered, e.g. by a drug that causes strokes.
I used to work in a newsroom and this sounds like S.O.P. to me. Very often, an article is retained in whole or in part and updated throughout the day with new info and a different headline. In the internet age, people searching for news might see the same words relabeled a few times during the news cycle.
Almost every mainstream news story you read has at least one update, often with changes to the headline in the case of breaking news. Part of that is because of the linked nature of the internet, part of it is laziness because it’s easier to edit an already published article than to go through the process of creating one from scratch (possibly also a process shortcut depending upon the editorial procedures for the outfit as well.)
While we’re at it, any press announcent by a public figure is already in the hands of the media hours, possibly a day or more in advance under what’s called “embargo”. The media agrees to not leak the info in exchange for an advanced copy of a speech or public statement. This was used to help get stories pushed in the media and make more effective use of the media. The writers would have a chance to prewrite their pieces and go to print or screen or whatever faster this way.
Didn’t knew this. Thanks!
Bull.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.