Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil

Yep. I don’t hold out much hope for the panel decision.


13 posted on 09/25/2021 12:59:42 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGurl24
We might get lucky.

Second Circuit: (1) Dubya judge, (2) Rapin Bill judges, (2) Odiousbama judges, (5) Trump judges, (1) BiteMe judge.

I didn't realize that The Senile Puddin Pop Puppet snuck one on to the Second.

So, it's 6-5 or 5-6 for the three-judge panel choice, depending on whether the Dubya judge is a squish. She's currently the chief judge of the Second [confirmed 91 - 0, but that was back in the old days].

In December, 2019, [Debra Ann] Livingston partially dissented from a federal appeals court ruling ordering that Donald Trump comply with a subpoena and turn over his tax returns to the U.S. House of Representatives.

She stated, "I cannot accept the majority's conclusions that 'this case does not concern separation of powers,' and that there is 'minimal at best' risk of distraction to this and future Presidents from legislative subpoenas of this sort."

Livingston said she would send the case back to a lower court and require the House committees to provide more details about the legislative purposes behind their requests before deciding whether the banks must comply.

14 posted on 09/25/2021 1:11:52 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson