Horrible judges can rule any way they want and they suffer no penalty for those rulings. Not even if they get slapped down. This needs to change.
Note that Maloney rhymes with Baloney.
Obviously a Science Denier.
Where did this judge get his medical degree at?
Maybe the judge doesn’t understand that the Covid “vaccines” are not actually vaccines, and that legal precedent pertaining to vaccines is not entirely on point.
Total misapplication of the law. This is a Judge more worried about his PR with the Lying Media then the rule of law.
Jacobson vrs Mass specifically refers to the state legislature having this power. It has no bearing on a case of arbitrary executive action.
This judge is not only ignoring the science, he is ignoring the facts. From several articles I read, people who had survived small pox, were not required to take a vaccine. Hence natural immunity has been recognized.
Additionally, the jurisdiction for such matters lies with the States/reserved for the people-it is NOT the province of Unconstitutional Executive edicts.
Where is the State law that says natural immunity is irrelevant?
I wonder who owns this Judge, or is he just sloppy in his rulings?
yes because this judge knows science, and these vax have been around so long and show they are safe right?
A federal judge has denied that natural immunity from prior Covid-19 infection is a legally justifiable reason
/\
\/
Bassakwards.
It’s medically justifiable ,
so it IS legally justifiable
What a weasel “ judge”.
The rape of justice
by a weasel in a black robe.
Spit.
The lawsuits will keep coming.
The judge denying natural immunity and is promoting quack science.
Even the CDC admit it’s a 99% survival. How did all these people survive if they do not have natural immunity?
While this judge is at it, lets address Pi. He should decree it to be 3.15 to simplify math for the world.
But Epoch Times reports that in the same state of Michigan a federal court judge ruled in favor of 16 unvaccinated Michigan student athletes on the basis of freedom of religion.
It’s a mess:
Religion trumps science.
Rights trump science.
Government trumps science.
Supreme Court trumps science.
Science trumps science
Judges says he had no choice. Reminds me of Pilate and Barabas. “No choice” there either.
As bleak as it looked at the moment, it was all part of a bigger plan.
Do not expect justice to be done on earth. Humans are by nature, unjust, and the systems they develop to “guide” them are even worse.
No choice, says the judge. And that, my friends, is the law.