Posted on 11/24/2021 1:52:27 PM PST by Fractal Trader
Dr. Luis Miguel De Benito, a digestive physician with a Ph.D. in molecular biology, presents an excerpt of the research on the mysterious MAC addresses detected in vaccinated individuals with Bluetooth apps.
It's a brief report that he has sent to different research teams worldwide and will be released in its entirety on the 31st of this month.
In this short preview, Dr. De Benito explains what he has observed and what could be the possible causes of this phenomenon.
[SNIP]
Of the 137 patients questioned, 112 said they had been vaccinated, and 25 said they hadn't been vaccinated. None of the patients who said they hadn't been vaccinated registered on my cell phone any device available for Bluetooth connection, having ensured the disconnection of their cell phone, if they had one. In 96 patients of the 112 who said they had been vaccinated, 96 of the 112 having switched off their electronic devices if they were carrying them, a MAC code remained on the screen of my cell phone, which I had already noted in my notes next to the patient's medical history.
I interpreted that it was a code that the patient himself was carrying and that, in fact, when he left the office, leaving the building, it disappeared from my cell phone. With this simple observation throughout July and August, I've been able to verify that 100% of the patients who say they aren't vaccinated don't raise any contact device with my cell phone via Bluetooth. But 86% of those who said they were vaccinated generated a MAC address on my cell phone. These are the observations made, and many doubts and questions arise from them. [SNIP] If the MAC Address is something personal, individual, and unrepeatable, how is it possible that the five people who were injected with the contents of the same vial, from the same distribution of the same batch, don't have 5 different MAC addresses? Well, I consulted with some computer technicians, roboticists and fellow biologists and engineers, experts in computer science, and nanorobotics. And they advocate the possibility that this code is generated as a result of the interaction of what's injected with the genetic material of the patient. Perhaps not so much with their DNA as with the larger compatibility complex, the HLAs, which are ultimately derived from the genome.
The first one: some of the vials could be placebo.
Second: some vials could be denatured.
Third: a lack of response. In other words, the expected results are not always obtained when a product is applied.
And the fourth, which seems very important to me, is because the patient lies and says he is vaccinated when he isn't to avoid problems or controversies.
I have many doubts. These are the findings that I've made. They're outside my medical knowledge. I simply attest that when you're in consultation with a person in an isolated environment, that comes up on my cell phone. What does it mean? I have no idea. But I don't like it.
ping
I swear to God, FR gets more stupid every day. Mods should pull this thread!
Mark of the Beast!
Brings new meaning to the term, Let's hook up.
There is no “31st of this month.”
“It’s a brief report that he has sent to different research teams worldwide and will be released in its entirety on the 31st of this month.”
No 31st of this month (November).
B.S. alert.
The doctor claims that not all cell phones are equal and his is special.
if this is the case, what is the brand and model of his phone so his experiment can be repeated ?
On the other hand I find it likely that the spike proteins your body will be forced to make will have the vax lot number encoded into them. and after 2 vaxes you shed an almost unique code of the lot numbers, after 3 or 4 you are probably unique
I’ve been able to verify that 100% of the patients who say they aren’t vaccinated don’t raise any contact device with my cell phone via Bluetooth. But 86% of those who said they were vaccinated generated a MAC address on my cell phone.
—
This article is written by someone with little understanding of technical jargon, but they want to throw out terms like bluetooth or MAC address..
A MAC address, in and of itself, is nothing more than a hardware address baked into a piece of hardware. This article seems to make the claim that vaccinated people are generating a bluetooth signal which transmits a MAC address. Unless these people are wired up, there is no way they can be transmitting a coherent bluetooth signal at 2.45 GHz.
LOL, excellent point.
“if the MAC address is generated by the vaccine, “
What would be the power source?
How would the vaccine transmit a signal?
How is the address generated?
ROTFL! This is ABSOLUTE BUNK!
LOL!
First if it was a Mac address it would the same starting prefix that would tell you the maker and then the reast would need to be unique per person
If he saw the same full address.. they are reading the same thing in the room
I’ve been able to verify that 100% of the patients who say they aren’t vaccinated don’t raise any contact device with my cell phone via Bluetooth. But 86% of those who said they were vaccinated generated a MAC address on my cell phone.
—
Maybe these people are wearing a FitBit or Apple Watch. These would generate a bluetooth signal. Hell, I’ve got a damn electric toothbrush with built-in bluetooth.
The vac was the best thing that happened to me. Once I realized I had my own MAC address I registered myself with Apple, uploaded all my memories to the cloud and transferred all my music directly to my brain. What’s even better, when I’m feeling lonely and lost I can use the find my phone app and find myself and get back on track. :)
> There is no “31st of this month. <
I caught that too. By “this month” I assume the author means November, as the article was written on 24 November. But November only has 30 days.
I’m not just nit-picking. Instead I’m wondering if the author is trying to tell us something here (that the article is a fraud).
More stupid, or more 'woke'; with comments like this. If the story ends up being fraudulent then FR is likely to uncover the truth of it. But screaming that something should be pulled just because you may not like something? Just remember what opinions are like and how everyone has one.
What MAC address preface does it use? Netgear’s? Cisco’s?
This is absolute bunk, but very funny.
The article is either really bad satire, or written by a moron.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.