Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ProfessorGoldiloxx

If you look at May 2021 discussions over this...the terms used was ‘preliminary findings’ and ‘probable burials’.

Someone should suggest to the Canadian government that they erect a monument to the 200-odd supposedly non-dead on the site, and see how far they get with that.


3 posted on 01/19/2022 11:22:17 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

Incidentally, GPR normally cannot indicate actual skeletal remains. It shows anomalies under the soil, which means anything denser than the soil. Old skeletal remains or pieces of wood are not denser and usually do not show up. The only blips you might see would be from metal on a casket or from some other denser material that was buried.

And even these things you only see as an ambiguous blip of light. If you see a set of blips in a row when doing an old cemetery, you can probably assume you have a row of burials and that they probably were marked at one time or another. It may not have been much of a marker, but they were identified individually.

There is no way they can make this “mass burial” assertion without an excavation (called “ground truthing”) and they know it. And they know they’re lying, so don’t expect any excavations any day soon.


13 posted on 01/20/2022 4:02:51 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson