Posted on 04/20/2022 9:08:19 PM PDT by libertasbella
What is a Minarchist?
A Minarchist is someone who believes that the state should only exist for the purpose of maintaining law and order. Minarchism is a Libertarian political philosophy where the state’s only function is protecting individuals from theft, breach of contract, fraud, and aggression.
The government would still maintain the military, police, courts, fire departments, prisons, and legislatures, but the state would have no ability to interfere with the capitalist interactions and transactions of the people.
These states are referred to as “Night-watchman states.” One of the biggest supporters of this philosophy was Robert Nozick and he talked about it in his book “Anarchy, State, and Utopia.”
Minarchists believe that this standby approach to the economy will result in improved economic prosperity compared to the current system. Essentially, the word “minarchist” means “minimal statism” or “minimal state.”
They want as little interference as possible other than to protect the contracts between two private individuals. They want the government and state to act as a checks and balances system rather than enforcement of the system.
This method of governing is most popular with Libertarianism of the United States and the right-libertarian political philosophy. That said, it’s also been popular with libertarian socialists and other leftists.
Some of them believe that a minimal welfare state is appropriate only when social safety nets are put in place for the working class. They believe that eliminating welfare programs would only make sense if you also eliminate capitalism. Some more extreme leftists believe that it would be better to repeal corporate welfare rather than social welfare for underprivileged and poor people.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.libertasbella.com ...
The minarchism definition means “minimal government intervention.” The main thing to remember is that people with this ideology believe that the government still has its role in society, but they need to take a step back and let the people transact as they please.
Many confuse minarchists with Anarchists who believe that the government has no role and should not have any purpose in maintaining checks and balances. Anarchists believe that you should be responsible for defending your property, enforcing your own laws, and backing up your own contracts with as much or as little force as necessary.
Ideology and Philosophy of a Minarchist
Many minarchists justify that a state still has its role in providing logical consequences for aggression. Some believe that it’s impossible to have any form of society without a state because the optional enforcement of laws makes for an unviable political system.
They’re saying that when you take away the state, you’re basically saying that the people should be responsible for defending themselves and everything they work hard for. This thinking would obviously not work in 99% of situations where there are many people unable to defend and protect themselves on their own.
Another issue is the privatization of defense and courts. Most minarchists believe that privatizing law enforcement, military, and courts would create a bias that would unevenly represent those who are capable of paying more for their protection.
Of course, there is a lot of skepticism over whether or not that happens in government already because a political system built on total government control has the potential for bias as well. Most minarchists believe that a night-watchman state can develop a political system that respects individual rights.
Taxation is another big issue addressed by minarchists and libertarians alike. Some support taxation because they believe it’s a necessary evil to prevent “free riders.” Others strongly oppose it and think that it’s wrong for the people to have to pay for government funding in a free society.
Ayn Rand is one of the most notable opponents of taxation, but she also believes that the removal of tax should occur gradually so as not to cripple the economic society. This also brings up the issue of whether or not a minarchy would require the people to pay tax or fees for the services provided.
When you call for a tow truck to tow your car, you have to pay for that service; it’s not a human right. In a capitalist democracy, police, firefighters, courts, and legislature are rights available to citizens provided that they pay the necessary tax to receive those rights.
It’s a grey area as to whether or not the minarchist state would pay for these services on a case-to-case basis and how they would enforce these rules.
Continued on Libertas Bella
Bookmark
It’s been a while, but what I remember from Nozick’s work is that minarchism still violates what is now referred to as the Non-Aggression Policy. So he preferred anarchy.
In the US libertarians span a rather large set of beliefs. There are left (not leftist) libertarians who are pro-choice, etc. like those in the Libertarian Party. There are right libertarians some of who are never trumpers because of his immigration and tariff policies.
It would be helpful if there were more official designations for different types of libertarians. Libertarians for and against government projects like dams and highways, for and against national parks, for and against government regulations to combat externalities like pollution, for and against government programs like space flight & the internet & medical research.
Conservatives have divided themselves into neo, paleo, rino, etc. Libertarians can just decide on an ad hoc basis what they decide is too much or too little government. At least anarchists and minarchists have consistent positions. Libertarianism is quite fungible.
Disney World was an example of a private organization providing self governance. It is also an example of how Leftists always ruin a good thing.
Here’s a compromise I would applaud. Every time a new law is passed, revoke an existing law with comparable funding. At the very least can everyone agree we have enough laws?
The almighty himself only needed ten laws and about six hundred regulations from what I remember from Leviticus.
You can divide libertarians into 2 categories, capital L and small l libertarians.
Capital L libertarians are Ron Paul nut jobs.
Small l libertarians are pissed off conservatives.
It’s fun watching leftists losing their minds, just because a conservative governor wouldn’t bow down to a woke corporate agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.