[T Ruth]

Sussman is being charged with lying to the FBI. A Twitter post from Hillary Clinton that makes no reference to Sussman doesn't seem to be evidence of anything that isn't already known.

A Twitter post from Hillary Clinton that makes use of the fruit of Sussman's lie tends to corroborate that Sussman was working for Clinton or her campaign.

already known? In a trial, nothing whatever is known unless it is admitted in evidence.

[T Ruth]

A Twitter post from Hillary Clinton that makes use of the fruit of Sussman’s lie tends to corroborate that Sussman was working for Clinton or her campaign — especially if the tweet was made very soon after the fruit developed, allowing an inference that either she had back-channel access to the information or that it was all lined up ahead of time.