Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Impala64ssa

No way that kid should have been able to get that weapon. Cops knew he was a troubled soul. No good comes from arming the deranged like that. Time for some common sense. Now is not the time to not pick on the definition of whether it was technically “military grade.”


12 posted on 05/25/2022 1:09:32 PM PDT by bhl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bhl

How did he get the weapons, a brand new truck and eyeliner?


16 posted on 05/25/2022 1:32:09 PM PDT by Shady (The #JihadJunta: "We are now a nation of Men, Not of Laws. You are not as equal as we are...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bhl
Cops knew he was a troubled soul. No good comes from arming the deranged like that. Time for some common sense.

It doesn't matter what the cops "know."

1. We have this idiotic process of sealing juvenile records. This kid could have stolen 100 cars, set a dozen houses on fire, and tortured animals every day of his life as a minor ... but a background check conducted on his 18th birthday would show that he's a law abiding citizen.

2. HIPAA confidentiality laws prevent the disclosure of mental health records to the police.

In other words ... The combination of #1 and #2 means that the background check process for a firearms permit won't even reveal anything about the people who should never own a firearm.

17 posted on 05/25/2022 1:32:30 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bhl

No. Pick apart every single point they try and make. The reasonable ones off to the side will soon see that EVERY point they try is a lie.
Discredit them. Mock them. Give no ground on anything.


18 posted on 05/25/2022 1:32:49 PM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bhl
The problem is not rooted in his possession of a weapon, nor in the weapon he possessed. Nothing I have read thus far would indicate derangement or in someway disqualify his purchase or possession.

Now a FFL may correct me on the Background Form...but
FLK-Funny Looking Kid and NQR-Not Quite Right are not disqualifiers.

If his murders were not known - what removes his right to bear arms?

32 posted on 05/25/2022 3:25:21 PM PDT by PsyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson