Posted on 06/18/2022 9:05:59 AM PDT by grundle
Insider just published this article about the “struggles” of a “low income” “single mom.” The article makes exactly zero mention of the father of the children.
The mainstream media has been doing everything it can to try to normalize the idea that children don’t need a father. I’ve previously written about this kind of thing here, here, here, here, here, and here.
In this particular case, the mother wants the government to give her $187,000 in taxpayers’ money. That’s the amount of money that the mother borrowed under her own name to pay for her children to go to college so they could become “successful.”
So here’s my question: If these children are “successful,” why aren’t they willing to use their own money to pay back the loans?
How was she able to get a loan?
“Single moms” are starting to find out why marriage was so important. There’s a reason why people used to look down on women pumping out kids with no husband around to care for the family. That’s not the taxpayers’ job. The jerks never should have put “single moms” up on a pedestal.
The government encourages this. If the father hangs around and provides support, the baby mama doesn’t get all of the government goodies. As a result, we have the government celebrating it. “Look at that brave single mother raising her children all by herself!”
The kids find out soon enough when they realize their mother has absolute control over the “family’. There is no balance of power.
Because the left wants more women who had sex with a man who explicitly showed them that he was not committed to them.
That is another victim group. The left wants as many growing victim groups as possible to justify taking money from normal people and giving it to the victim group.
Besides, the left is destroying the family and this is really helping their effort.
“Single moms” are starting to find out why marriage was so important. There’s a reason why people used to look down on women pumping out kids with no husband around to care for the family. That’s not the taxpayers’ job. The jerks never should have put “single moms” up on a pedestal.
Dan Quayle knew.
Not everyone needs or should go to college to be successful. She and her kids should have considered other options. But we’ve been brainwashed in this country to think college is the only avenue. And instead of her realizing her mistake with her first two, she plans on tripling down on it with her soon to be graduated third child.
Don't you get that?
Worthless school counselors just selling over priced colleges, bad behaviorist family psychologists, family counselors that are based on fads and trendy new ideas... that combined with public education, TV, music and Social Media will form this new “successful” person.
This "successful" person will him/herself likely divorce (children of divorced parents have a higher divorce rate), need social assistance more likely, have a higher incidence of run ins with the law, earn less on average, and have trouble paying back their debts... The solution here is obvious. We need more kids to go to college and the government needs to pay off their debt. That's the problem, right?
Clearly the father is a blogger.
As a class: deadbeats, criminals and generally shady characters.
“The state (as in government) is the child’s father.”
And the internet is the educator and babysitter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.