Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remembering Title IX Abuses
James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal ^ | June 24, 2022 | Joseph Warta

Posted on 06/24/2022 3:21:26 AM PDT by karpov

Recently, Title IX has been in the news because of the Biden administration’s promised (and, as of yesterday, delivered) rejection of much-needed Trump-era reforms. As we are approaching the 50th anniversary of the statute, introduced as part of the Education Amendments of 1972, it is worth revisiting the history of Title IX and reviewing its often tragic legacy.

Title IX was borne of a desire for equal rights in education. In a nutshell, the purpose of the legislation was to mandate gender equality by banning gender discrimination in colleges and universities receiving federal funds. Title IX sought to enforce gender equality in sports, as well, a purpose that is simple enough and hardly controversial.

However, as with plenty of legislative history, the dubious story that followed is both frustrating and tragic. The original legislation, meant simply to level the playing field, has turned into a cudgel with which overzealous colleges and universities can impose their agendas. Obama-era interpretations of Title IX moved the collegiate judicial system toward a standard of “guilty until proven innocent,” even though accusations are often impossible to disprove. Perhaps worst of all is that these affronts to justice have been made under the guise of gender equality.

(Excerpt) Read more at jamesgmartin.center ...


TOPICS: Education; Government
KEYWORDS: college; sexualharassment; titleix

1 posted on 06/24/2022 3:21:26 AM PDT by karpov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: karpov

Title IX wasn’t started to mandate “gender equality.” That Newspeak wasn’t de rigueur in 1972.


2 posted on 06/24/2022 4:03:07 AM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

One of the most obvious results of title 9 was the disappearance of most college wrestling programs, leaving only the name brand wrestling schools intact.


3 posted on 06/24/2022 4:28:07 AM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

“gender equality in sports, as well, a purpose that is simple enough and hardly controversial”

I beg to differ. This is one of those Marxist absurdities converted into law. One of the ways in which men and women are different is their interest in physical contests.

Women’s participation levels have always been much much lower. The consequences of this was the killing of all sorts of men’s non revenue sports and the elevation of really mediocre women’s sports.


4 posted on 06/24/2022 4:41:28 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Yep.

IIRC some schools tried to get womens dance teams and cheerleading classed as scholarship-able sports, with limited success, as a counterweight….


5 posted on 06/24/2022 6:07:19 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: karpov

I want to know if Lia Thompson is Title IX athlete


6 posted on 06/24/2022 7:20:53 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson