Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fed Dead Redemption! Blackstone’s $69 Billion Real Estate Fund Hits Redemption Limit (Equity REITs DOWN -23.6% In 2022, Mortgage REITs DOWN -28.6%)
Confounded Interest ^ | 12/03/2022 | Anthony B. Sanders

Posted on 12/03/2022 7:39:19 AM PST by Kaiser8408a

As The Federal Reserve continues its assault on inflation by raising their target rate, Blackstone Inc.’s $69 billion real estate fund for wealthy individuals said it will limit redemption requests, one of the most dramatic signs of a pullback at a top profit driver for the firm and a chilling indicator for the property industry.

Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust Inc. has been facing withdrawal requests exceeding its quarterly limit, a major test for the one of the private equity firm’s most ambitious efforts to reach individual investors. The news, in a letter Thursday, sent Blackstone stock falling as much as 10%, the biggest drop since March.

You can see the problem facing commercial real estate. Since December 31, 2021, NAREIT’s all-equity REIT index has fallen -23.6% while NAREIT’s mortgage REIT index has fallen -28.6%. It looks like Blackstone’s Real Estate Income Trust has a decline coming.

If I look at NCREIF’s commercial property index, we can see that The Fed helped boost CRE values. But what will happen if and when The Fed actually shrinks its balance sheet.

I call The Fed’s attempts at cooling inflation “Fed Dead Redemption” since it resulted in redemptions from real estate funds.

(Excerpt) Read more at confoundedinterest.net ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: amazon; anwr; biden; bidenflation; blackrock; blackstone; blogpimp; cre; diesel; esg; fed; federalreserve; hedgefunds; housing; jeffbezos; keystonexl; mortgage; mortgages; nareit; opec; opecplus; prettywoman; reit; retread
Biden/Pelosi/Schummer's insane green energy policies and reckless Federal handouts have created mayhem in markets.
1 posted on 12/03/2022 7:39:19 AM PST by Kaiser8408a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaiser8408a

BidenDepression II 2023

Obama’s death to the USA by 10,000 cuts


2 posted on 12/03/2022 7:49:39 AM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaiser8408a

Who will be the Long Term Capital Management or Lehman Brothers of the next crisis?

The crypto bankruptcies are just an appetizer. Who on Wall Street will be the main course?


3 posted on 12/03/2022 7:51:10 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaiser8408a

This is nothing. The fact that the economy refuses to slow down after multiple .75% rate hikes is the big news right now.


4 posted on 12/03/2022 7:59:49 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (The only way to secure your own future is to create it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

“The crypto bankruptcies are just an appetizer. Who on Wall Street will be the main course?”

The federal government under President George W. Bush in 2008 had a decision to make regarding the “too big to fail” Wall Street investment banks. The government could have allowed them to go into bankruptcy restructuring (like the airline industry went through in the 1990’s and early 2000’s), paid off the depositors of any liquidated banks up to the FDIC limits, and let the bondholders, stockholders, and executives incur the losses. Second step reinstall the Depression era Glass Steagall law which separated investment banking from retail banking and kept investment bankers from speculating with retail accounts. Then begin enforcing anti-trust laws to keep the big New York banks from buying up regional banks and thereby becoming “too big to fail” in the future. If the investors, bondholders, and executives had absorbed the financial loss, instead of the taxpayers, future investors in banking and investment firm stocks and bonds would have been extremely demanding that the banks be financially sound. Government backstopping of businesses is an incentive for taking on risk, not an incentive to manage assets conservatively.

The second option was to bail out the big banks. This is the option President Bush, his Goldman Sachs treasury secretary, and the Federal Reserve chose. Within a year the bailed out banks were paying multimillion dollar bonuses to executives and easing back into the activities that resulted in failure. In addition, Wall Street financiers gave heavily to Democrat candidates in the 2008 election to ensure government had their backs.

It is beginning to appear that our failure to allow capitalism to work and sweep away the bloated insolvent firms in 2008, will result in another financial crisis caused by greed, excessive risk taking, and payoffs to politicians. Both political parties are completely complicit in the coming travesty.


5 posted on 12/03/2022 8:08:26 AM PST by Soul of the South (The past is gone and cannot be changed. Tomorrow can be a better day if we work o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

It is beginning to appear that our failure to allow capitalism to work and sweep away the bloated insolvent firms in 2008, will result in another financial crisis caused by greed, excessive risk taking, and payoffs to politicians. Both political parties are completely complicit in the coming travesty.

***********
I like your first option, but ever since the deflation of the 1920’s & 1930’s, where you had multi year deflation the PTB have decided to error on the inflationary side.

There will be a high price to pay for the bailout and cheap money policies of the last 14 years.

Great post, Soul of the South.
Well done.


6 posted on 12/03/2022 8:42:24 AM PST by unclebankster (Globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

“This is nothing. The fact that the economy refuses to slow down after multiple .75% rate hikes is the big news right now.”
**********

The central bankers have no reason to not continue their interest rate hikes.
Much to the chagrin of commercial operations that are dependent on cheap money.

My eardrums can already imagine the screeching going into 2023 & 2024. Fortunately I won’t hear them as a manufacturer.

“I’ll be wearing earplugs.”


7 posted on 12/03/2022 8:50:45 AM PST by unclebankster (Globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...
This is Blackstone, curiously similar name, anyway, here's all of the "Blackrock" search results:

8 posted on 12/03/2022 10:21:28 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
The second option was to bail out the big banks. This is the option President Bush, his Goldman Sachs treasury secretary, and the Federal Reserve chose.

They shoveled out the short-term loans.

Within a year the bailed out banks were paying multimillion dollar bonuses to executives and easing back into the activities that resulted in failure.

Not only that, they also repaid all those loans. And made tens of billions in profits for the US Treasury.

9 posted on 12/04/2022 5:21:37 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson