What linguistic trick is there when someone doesn’t follow a subpoena?
What do you say to the claim that the subpoena IS the linguistic trick that makes it impossible to follow?
CTS alleges that the subpoena asks for all documents "with classified markings," not "classified documents."
President Trump alleges that they turned over all "classified documents," and what remains are either documents that have been declassified but still contain "classified markings," or documents "with classified markings" that are lower than top secrets (e.g., confidential).
Do you have an opinion on the claims by Sundance?
-PJ