If you would like more information about what’s happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me. Please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list.
Posted on 07/03/2023 3:22:12 PM PDT by CFW
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Monday that a law banning the recording of persons who do not explicitly consent to their voices being captured is unconstitutional, as it violates the First Amendment.
James O’Keefe of O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) announced the decision online, noting that this follows his filing of a lawsuit in Portland, Oregon about three years ago. In PVA v. Schmidt, O’Keefe’s former journalistic organization argued that Oregon law violates the US Constitution, especially in regard to the rights of those engaging in undercover investigative journalism.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostmillennial.com ...
So this would mean jack smith’s case against President Trump saying on a recording he had classified docs is kaput- correct?
So will this effect peep using FISA in secretly recording us citizens
Doesn’t apply and not relevant. Trump voluntarily sat down for a recorded interview, ran his mouth, now needs to explain what he said. Very different than some states saying you must have permission of everyone before recording. Ninth circuit says now that is unconstitutional, need that to go nationally.
You brain dead Soros AI chatbots never sleep, do ya?
?
“The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Monday that a law banning the recording of persons who do not explicitly consent to their voices being captured is unconstitutional, as it violates the First Amendment.”
Crooked cops (and others) are pizzed because their violations of the law are constitutionally recorded and can be used agaist them in a court of law.
Poor little cops, their one way street is closed for repair.
.
No, the government needs a warrant to wiretap. Well, more correctly, they are supposed to get one.
You have the constitutional right to remain silent. You have the right to open your mouth, brag, and insert toes….
Yep, exactly.
Below is a link to the complaint filed three years ago against the local DA and Oregon’s AG.
Below is the link to the opinion by Judge Ikuta with Judge Bea and Morgan concurring. Christen dissenting.
https://www.scribd.com/document/656890916/Project-Veritas-Et-Al-v-Mich-37
I wonder if this might be extended to the prohibition on recording police activity. I always wondered how that could possibly be illegal.
Nice win, James!
So this is the 9th? Then what effect will it have on David Daleiden?
Several circuits have already ruled recording of police in the performance of their public duties, is constitutionally protected under the First Amendment.
“So this is the 9th? Then what effect will it have on David Daleiden?”
Good question!!!
No, just the opposite.
If you would like more information about what’s happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me. Please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list.
Ha!
Bam!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.