Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
But the Founders wrote that clause envisioning a collection of powerful and occasionally competing states.

They also envisioned an economy where most of what people used would be produced locally, and goods would be relatively generic. They didn't envision an economy where things people used would be produced across the country or across the world, and processed brands replace generic staple goods.

5 posted on 07/03/2023 9:05:58 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: x

So in your opinion the Commerce Clause is fully validated in any application ?


6 posted on 07/03/2023 9:27:37 PM PDT by A strike ("The worse, the better."- Lenin (& Schwab & Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: x
They didn't envision an economy where things people used would be produced across the country or across the world

I doubt that's true. Why did Jefferson write into the Declaration of Independence:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
They were very aware of regional growth of fruits and vegetables, wheat and corn, cotton and barley, fish, trees, coal and sulfur, granite and limestone, etc.

They didn't expect the regions to horde what they had; they expected them to trade what they had to obtain what they did not have.

-PJ

9 posted on 07/03/2023 11:08:36 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: x
I'm not sure what your point is here. As I see it, those who enacted the Constiution were well aware that France was the Europesn economic powerhouse. Commerce flowed freely inside of its borders. At the same time, due to the Treaty if Westphalia, every jurisdiction within the Holy Roman Empire was free to impose tariffs of goods passing through their lands. Movement of goods a relatively short distance resulted in tariff payments so extensive that commerce was prevented. To prevent a similar preclusion upon the shipment of goods, the Constitution vests the power to "regulate commerce between the states" in the Congress.

I am sure we agree that once the Court began to apply made up tests, such as whether an activity had an "impact on commerce" or an "effect on commerce," the commerce clas Use became so misshapen that Congress siezed the power to prohibit growing a crop for the owner's own use, i.e. Wickard v Filburn (Congress passed the Agricultural Adjustmen Act so that it could balance the forces of supply and demand in the same manner as Soviet Russia, while the NYT suppressed its awareness of the holomodor, but I digress)

All that being said, the nature of the commerce passing over state borders, whether it be harvested crops or Amazon packages containing electronics, should really not be a salient factor.

15 posted on 07/04/2023 4:24:08 AM PDT by frithguild (The warmth and goodness of Gaia is a nuclear reactor in the Earth's core that burns Thorium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: x

They also envisioned a moral and religious people


30 posted on 07/04/2023 6:20:45 AM PDT by Nifster ( I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson