Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bidenomics (Or Yellenomics)! Real Weekly Earnings For Men LOWER Under Biden Than Jimmy Carter! (Men’s Real Weekly Earnings DOWN -9% Since Q2 2021 While M2 Money UP 31%)
Confounded Interest ^ | 08/01/2023 | Anthony B. Sanders

Posted on 08/01/2023 7:23:21 AM PDT by Kaiser8408a

President Jimmy Carter is usually the bar for terrible Presidents. Under Carter, the US experienced economic stagnation and soaring inflation. At least it led to the election of Ronald Regan!

So, Biden’s much mentioned Bidenomics have produced REAL MEDIAN WEEKLY EARNINGS FOR MEN that is currently below 1979 levels under Jimmy Carter.

Even worse for Bidenomics, REAL MEDIAN WEEKLY EARNINGS GROWTH FOR MEN was -4.45% In April 2023, while the last reading prior to Covid under Trump was 6.674% YoY in February 2020. So, Bidenomics isn’t even back to Trump levels for men.

I like this chart which I call “Yellenomics” because it illustrates The Fed’s Folly of money printing and its impact on real earnings. After the Trump wage growth boom, real median weekly earnings for men has been steadily declining.

Women, on the other hand, did show a gain. But perhaps that was Dylan Mulvaney’s lucrative Bud Light deal. /sarc

Reminds me of The Yardbird’s classic “I’m A Man.” Worse off under Biden than under Jimmy Carter. Although The Yardbird’s “Over Under Sideways DOWN” is more emblematic of Bidenomics.

Bidenomics should be renamed Corruptionomics given Biden’s habit of selling government influence to anyone willing to waive a few million.

(Excerpt) Read more at confoundedinterest.net ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: biden; bidenflation; inflation; wages; yellen
Yup, Biden sells out the taxpayer for family wealth. Typical Democrat!
1 posted on 08/01/2023 7:23:21 AM PDT by Kaiser8408a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaiser8408a

Covid didn’t cruch the economy.

Government crushed the economy.


2 posted on 08/01/2023 7:24:51 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaiser8408a

The biden crime family strikes again


3 posted on 08/01/2023 7:33:24 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (The enemy has US surrounded. May God have mercy on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaiser8408a

ECONOMY: This Simple Chart Reveals the Distribution Of Global WealthPublished 2 years ago on September 20, 2021
By Anshool Deshmukh
Visualizing Global Wealth Distribution

▼ Use This Visualization
The Global Wealth Distribution in One Chart
The pandemic resulted in global wealth taking a significant dip in the first part of 2020. By the end of March, global household wealth had already declined by around 4.4%.

Interestingly, after much monetary and fiscal stimulus from governments around the world, global household wealth was more than able to recover, finishing up the year at $418.3 trillion, a 7.4% gain from the previous year.

Using data from Credit Suisse, this graphic looks at how global wealth is distributed among the adult population.

How is Global Wealth Distributed?

While individuals worth more than $1 million constitute just 1.1% of the world’s population, they hold 45.8% of global wealth.

Wealth Range Wealth Global Share (%) Adult Population
Over $1M $191.6 trillion 45.8% Held by 1.1%
$100k-$1M $163.9 trillion 39.1% Held by 11.1%
$10k-$100k $57.3 trillion 13.7% Held by 32.8%
Less > $10k $5.5 trillion 1.3% Held by 55.0%
Total> $418.3 trillion 100.% Held by 100.0%

On the other end of the spectrum, 55% of the population owns only 1.3% of global wealth.

https://brownstone.org/articles/capital-postmodernism-left-authoritarianism-unholy-alliance/


4 posted on 08/01/2023 7:51:50 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Now, Send Asylum Seekers to all the vacant college dorms in NY/NJ/Mass/West Point & NE blue cities!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaiser8408a

For some reason, people forget that the prime interest rate, the rate charged to the best customers, reached 21% under Carter and economic growth was negative, and inflation was over 22%.


5 posted on 08/01/2023 8:33:23 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaiser8408a

I hope black American men see these stats. Just read the Washington Post article on Dems being worried they are losing the black male vote and how they (democrats) must do a better job (of lying) to keep them from defecting.


6 posted on 08/01/2023 8:35:28 AM PDT by Lake Living
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Men’s Real Weekly Earnings DOWN –9%
Down negative nine percent? Would that not mean to be up nine percent?
7 posted on 08/01/2023 10:13:21 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson