The judge’s ruling represents a critical victory for religious freedom,
an embedded right that progressives have been attacking for years.
The ruling could set a precedent b/c it applied a U.S. Supreme Court precedent to the case:
“Plaintiffs were forced to choose between (a) following their beliefs and (b) a government benefit
for which they were otherwise qualified,” Judge Maloney said.
Further highlights how liberty-minded Christians can fight back against the authoritarian left
to punish people for exercising.......or merely articulating their beliefs.......ala Trump.
Well, how do ya like them apples?...................