She skipped over the “shall not be infringed” part of the 2A. Her reasoning is incoherent. Hope the case is appealed.
I noticed she conveniently inserts the "assault weapon" term without really defining what characteristics constitute one. It's really just a euphemism for "things I don't like".
15 posted on 08/26/2023 5:29:18 AM PDT by Ranxerox