Replies

I question her claim that blacks in Europe built Stonehenge, since if current archeological dating is to be believed, it was built in approximately 3000 to 2000 BC, when the Israelite civilizaton of the Bible was already established. Christ walked the earth from Gregorian year 1 to 33 AD, and has historically been described as Semetic, not negroid. There is plenty of art work buried in Pompeii in 79 AD that depicts "white" Europeans. From Israel and Stonehenge to Christ to Pompeii is a span of at most 3000 years or possibly fewer.

So, could a society of black Europeans that she claims built Stonehenge have "evolved" into white peoples within 3000 years? I have doubts.

There are many theories and artist's renderings of the earliest humans supposedly all arising from Africa, with primate forehead ridges above the eyes, dark skin and wiry hair—the evolutionist's gospel; but somewhere along the line, light-eyed roundheads with flat foreheads, straight hair and pale skin predominated in Europe.

It is of course tempting for today's woke racialists to shorten the timeline from “black” to “white” in their depictions of Europeans; but even if the general theory of evolution is correct, it would seem to take longer than a few thousand years for such marked changes as skull formation, hair, skin and eye color and musculature to change society-wide.

Mars, the Roman god of war
fresco painted prior to 79 AD, unearthed in Pompeii