Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego

Literally the only requirement is that the Senator “be an inhabitant” of the state at the time of election (or appointment).

Still, it seems like there are plenty of leftist black women in California available to fulfill Gavin’s pandering promise. Why not Senator Maxine Waters?


7 posted on 10/02/2023 7:34:04 PM PDT by Tipllub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Tipllub

LOL!

Senator Mad Max!

LOL!

Well played!


16 posted on 10/02/2023 9:12:37 PM PDT by Taxman (SAVE AMERICA! VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2023 AND 2024!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Tipllub

> the Senator “be an inhabitant” of the state at the time of election

The 17th amendment put the appointment authority in the hands of state legislatures, and to the Governors if the legislature of the state was not in session, or the legislature could delegate to the governor. So the only requirement in California statutes I could find is that the appointee must be a “qualified elector” in the state. Not sure how that is actually defined in California. But I imagine if the appointee can’t legally vote in the state it would be difficult for them to be a “qualified elector” under the possible readings of the term…

But hey, it’s up to the Senate majority to decide if she can be seated…the only recourse for the people of the state is the next election. Or they could punish Gruesome Newsome by recall.

Like that’s gonna make a difference, heheh.


22 posted on 10/03/2023 8:00:40 AM PDT by no-s (Jabonera, urna, jurado, cartucho ... ya sabes cómo va...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson