Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, Vanderbilt Isn’t Governed By “Principled Neutrality”. The university’s actions give the lie to its professed stance.
James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal ^ | October 25, 2023 | Lyell Asher

Posted on 10/27/2023 3:58:39 AM PDT by karpov

Anyone concerned about industrial-scale political indoctrination on American college campuses was given reason for hope this past spring when, in the pages of The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vanderbilt University chancellor Daniel Diermeier reaffirmed his institution’s commitment to “principled neutrality”—the idea that the university and its leadership will “refrain from taking positions on controversial issues except when the issue directly relates to the functioning of the institution.” The goal of this commitment is ostensibly to encourage “thoughtful debate” and to discourage what Diermeier called (citing Joshua Green) “moral tribalism”: the tendency to “rush to judgment” and “default to moral condemnation in place of argument and persuasion.”

Diermeier’s essay struck a chord with me in part because, as a college professor, I’ve seen firsthand the collapse of non-partisanship on the part of university officials and administrators. It’s now de rigeur for college presidents and other officials to issue statements decrying election outcomes or Supreme Court decisions that disturb progressive sensibilities.

But the essay also resonated with me because, as a student at Vanderbilt in the late ’70s, I was a beneficiary of what Chancellor Diermeier rightly refers to as the institution’s “longstanding commitment to free expression and open forums,” a commitment that former senator and Vanderbilt alumnus Lamar Alexander experienced a decade earlier in the more turbulent ’60s. As Alexander put it in a Wall Street Journal op-ed praising Diermeier’s stance, “the university was being pummeled from the left and right for hosting controversial speakers like Allen Ginsberg, Stokely Carmichael and Strom Thurmond.” Alexander no doubt spoke for many when he proclaimed Chancellor Diermeier’s statement on institutional neutrality to be “boldly reassuring” and expressed hope that other universities would follow Vanderbilt’s example.

(Excerpt) Read more at jamesgmartin.center ...


TOPICS: Education
KEYWORDS: college; dei; vanderbilt

1 posted on 10/27/2023 3:58:39 AM PDT by karpov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: karpov

Bkmk


2 posted on 10/27/2023 4:01:47 AM PDT by sauropod (The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Anyone who has to make an effort to tell people that they are neutral, isn’t!

This is like when used car dealerships try to claim that they are easy to deal with and don’t pressure people. It’s because they do... and everyone knows it.


3 posted on 10/27/2023 5:02:23 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson