Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

The case was always ridiculous - banks choose how much to lend based off their own appraisal of the property being borrowed against.


2 posted on 11/03/2023 7:58:04 AM PDT by PMAS (Vote with your wallets, there are 80 million of us - No China made, No Amazon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PMAS
The case was always ridiculous - banks choose how much to lend based off their own appraisal of the property being borrowed against.

I don't recall hearing about the banks complaining, so Trump must've made the loan payments on time.

5 posted on 11/03/2023 8:06:29 AM PDT by libertylover (Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: PMAS

That’s missing the point, badly. The case brought against Trump claimed he knowingly falsifying mortgage applications, which is a felony. The tricky part, and the main reason this case is weak, is they have to prove intent to defraud the lender. Trump has his valuation and while the numbers might be outrageous, they cant prove he had intent to defraud. The fact that he paid off many of these loans proves otherwise.


19 posted on 11/03/2023 8:50:02 AM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson