Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Do They Explain This? Video Shows 386,151 Votes REMOVED from GOP Supreme Court Candidate’s Totals in PA Where She Ended Up Losing by 207,237 (Video)
Gateway Pundit ^ | Nov. 16, 2023 8:00 am | Staff

Posted on 11/16/2023 9:46:38 AM PST by Red Badger

Audit the Vote PA released an explosive video following the November 7, 2023, Pennsylvania Supreme Court election that has so far been largely ignored.

We hope to change that today.

Thanks to Behizy for posting this on his popular Twitter-X account.

Audit the Vote PA posted video recently that shows 386,151 in-person votes were removed from Pennsylvania Republican Supreme Court candidate Carolyn Carluccio on election night.

Flash Sale On MyPillow’s Giza Dream Sheets – “The Nicest I’ve Ever Owned”

Republican Carluccio ended up losing the race by 207,237 votes but no one has given any explanation as to how votes just go down in a crucial election like this.

How do you explain this?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

George @BehizyTweets

In what world would votes ever go down in an election? This video shows 350,000 in-person votes being removed from the Republican Supreme Court Candidate in Pennsylvania

The candidate ended up losing the race by 200k votes but no one has given any explanation as to how votes just go down in a crucial election like this. This is exactly what happened to Trump in Pennsylvania as well

This video was released by Pennsylvania election integrity group

@Auditthevotepa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On Tuesday night, The Gateway Pundit spoke with Toni Shuppe the CEO of Audit the Vote PA. Shuppe works along with her partners, Karen Taylor and Vico Bertogli. Vico is the expert on data and analytics who discovered this supposed “glitch” on the State Department website.

Toni Shuppe told The Gateway Pundit that Audit the Vote PA is interested in transparency – “Transparency in the process will equal trust in the outcome.”

Tony added, “When you have the in-person vote totals on the State Department website, go down by 350,000 votes at 9:46 p.m. and no answers as to how that happened. You don’t have transparency in the process and, therefore, won’t have trust in the outcome. And that’s all we’re looking to do is restore public trust in the outcome of our elections.”

At 9:46 PM Carolyn Carluccio had tallied 763,873 votes in the state-wide race.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: electionfraud; paping; pennsylvania; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 11/16/2023 9:46:38 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It is to laugh.


2 posted on 11/16/2023 9:47:49 AM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

bookmark.


3 posted on 11/16/2023 9:51:18 AM PST by dadfly ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]



Sorry, umm it was like totally like that when I got here
4 posted on 11/16/2023 9:52:08 AM PST by dsrtsage ( Complexity is just simple lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Neither political party wants to investigate elections or take steps to ensure that results are honest, accountable and transparent.

The GOP doesn’t want to look at it.
The Democrats sure as hell don’t want to look at it.

And if you ask too many questions, the Oligarchy will arrest you.


5 posted on 11/16/2023 9:53:57 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Jail for you, you election denier!

But if you sign this guilty as charged plea deal, we can offer you no jail time as we drain your life's savings and retirement.

6 posted on 11/16/2023 9:56:25 AM PST by blackdog ((Z28.310) My dog Sam eats purple flowers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
The GOP doesn’t want to look at it

That's one reason I'm not interested in voting for them. I'll vote for Trump again, but I'm not thinking things will change from 2020. Pray it all collapses.

7 posted on 11/16/2023 9:59:43 AM PST by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

See tag line.


8 posted on 11/16/2023 10:05:33 AM PST by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Glitches happen often with all these new, secure, and far better digital voting systems.

I have an idea.

How about voting in person, on paper, with a state or federal ID which shows you are allowed to vote?

Imagine you only use a digital networked system to verify there is one vote per person, that the voting card is stored and that a fingerprint is on it as well as a signature stating that if you commit election fraud you will go to jail.

I know that isn’t all high tech with blinky lights... But I bet it would work.


9 posted on 11/16/2023 10:13:23 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If you thought New York State was corrupt, Hold my Yeungling!


10 posted on 11/16/2023 10:15:46 AM PST by Shady (The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

This is another example of what Edward Solomon investigated after the 2020 election and the pattern was clear and repeatable and attributable to the Dominion “module” that is used for simulating elections except it’s apparently being used to contrive them instead ... in a proper election system the datatypes do not allow for negative numbers and there is *no* way to subtract votes, you should only be able to add. What Solomon observed from the NYT source data, same as here from PA, is the algorithms get overwhelmed and need to reallocate their votes across precincts in order to ultimately achieve their desired result(s).


11 posted on 11/16/2023 10:24:01 AM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This problem & many others will not be solved by all the arseholes in DC. Just sit around & text on these sites. Don’t ever think of leaving your house to get involved or protest. The elites are sitting around on their yatches laughing it up & don’t think Trump can change this because no human can. It’s too far gone but don’t miss the NFL game tonight. Yea, that’s what is important.


12 posted on 11/16/2023 10:26:18 AM PST by Digger (. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The foreign entities hostile to The United States use their paid lackeys in The Democrat Party Organized Crime Syndicate to cheat at voting in order to weaken The United States.

It’s time for the Democrat Party Organized Crime Syndicate to go away.


13 posted on 11/16/2023 10:36:51 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Stealing elections is legal in PA.


14 posted on 11/16/2023 10:48:07 AM PST by bray (You can tell who the Commies fear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Soros’ team just rehearsing for the 2024 swindle...


15 posted on 11/16/2023 10:51:03 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I guess that we will soon learn what they say or not.

I'm betting on them remaining mum, as if there is nothing to explain, because they believe they are in control. Sadly, they just might be.

16 posted on 11/16/2023 10:51:37 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just a little preview of what’s to come in 2024.


17 posted on 11/16/2023 10:57:56 AM PST by lowbridge ("Let’s check with Senator Schumer before we run it" - NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They don’t have to explain anything. They have to be challenged, legally, or they win.

There were several videos of Trump’s vote totals dropping in 2020 (have some on my FR page) but he did nothing with them.


18 posted on 11/16/2023 10:58:45 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Jesus 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Because Democrats don’t have to explain their crimes.


19 posted on 11/16/2023 11:16:15 AM PST by libertylover (Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
They have to be challenged, legally, or they win.

LOL!

20 posted on 11/16/2023 11:59:53 AM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson