Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/30/2023 1:54:46 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

ADE


2 posted on 12/30/2023 2:11:55 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SecAmndmt; datura; Fractal Trader; grey_whiskers; metmom; Jane Long; tatown; Golden Eagle; ...

Covid ‘vaccine’ PING


3 posted on 12/30/2023 2:18:04 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I got Long Covid without getting the jabs, and it sucks.


4 posted on 12/30/2023 2:46:20 PM PST by ducttape45 (Proverbs 14:34, "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The long drawn out death rate from the sheep shots is something that will never be able to be quantified.


5 posted on 12/30/2023 2:49:53 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal (Jesus + Something = Nothing ; Jesus + Nothing = Everything )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In January 2020 Fauxi said masks don’t stop respiratory viruses (trained Ophthalmologist and know this is true.) and this is just a bad flu.

That’s the last time he told the truth.

Covid has been the scam of the century. Or more!


7 posted on 12/30/2023 3:03:34 PM PST by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Let's look at what the authors of the paper actually say, not what some antivax content creator at The Epoch Times has to say.

For two doses of COVID-19 vaccination, the odds ratio of Long COVID for acute COVID-19 severity was 7.5 (95% CI: 3.1,18.4), and for zero to one dose of COVID-19 vaccination, the odds ratio was 7.4 (95% CI: 3.5,15.8). This analysis rules out the possibility of interaction between COVID-19 vaccination and acute COVID-19 severity.

Interesting. The odds ratios were almost identical. And, looking at the entire 95% confidence interval, it is huge.

A 95% confidence interval means that the actual incidence number being estimated falls within the given range 95% of the time. This means that 5% of the time, it is not within that range. When the range is so large, the numbers are less robust.

Overall, the study is not a very strong one. It was based on telephone interviews of people who had previously been tested positive for Covid. There is a huge problem with reliability of any study based on subjective answers to questions. A much better methodology would have been for the Covid survivors to get an actual diagnosis from a medical professional. That would be more expensive, true, but would also be far more objective. Perhaps they don't have the funds in India to do a more robust study.

I do find it interesting that the study was published a year ago and only now did the professional antivaxxers on The Epoch Times staff manage to find it and twist it to give an antivax spin to it. Does this mean that the professional antivaxxers are running out of scientific material to misrepresent? Does this mean that the efforts of scientists to educate people are interfering with antivax fearmongering campaigns? One can only hope.

Characteristics and predictors of Long COVID among diagnosed cases of COVID-19.

8 posted on 12/30/2023 3:10:57 PM PST by exDemMom (Dr. exDemMom, infectious disease and vaccines research specialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson