Replies

Four years earlier Pius signed a concordant with Hitler. That didn’t work out too well.

Nor the one with Mussolini, nor the secret one with the USSR decades later.

It wasn't clear in 1933 exactly what Hitler was made of, and it would have been better had he behaved. Concordats like the one in 1933 don't necessarily mean you like the people you make it with, but an acknowledgement that they are a force to be reckoned with, as with the U.S. SALT agreements, the Red China talks, etc.

So, one could maintain that that Church "supported" Franco in Spain. At the time, the alternative was rule by Communists and Anarchists who seemed to specialize in torturing priests, nuns, and Catholics who would not go with the leftist program. In fact, the Church would have much preferred to be allied with a Carlist government in Spain, but that was no longer an option. Franco's and Salazar's brand of fascism was different than Hitler's, and Franco provided right of return of Jews from Germany, including Marranos. Spain's "non-belligerence" with Hitler was more acquiescence, The country was still reeling from her Civil War, and was in no position to resist the Nazis.