Posted on 01/08/2024 7:54:56 AM PST by PJ-Comix
“What I’ll never understand is why some FReepers supported and defended what Pence did on 1/6.”
I fail to understand how Pence made the short list to begin with.
____________________________________________________
I worry that Trump will make the same mistake again this year as he picks a running mate. His past choices are abysmal.
Are you high?
Look at you
You get exposed lying as usual with your moderate crap here
And your response instead of simply admitting you were were wrong is to project onto me what you did
It’s no secret here that moderates or lefties like you have for 24 years labeled me all sorts of names usually insisting I’m a racist etc as an unapologetic southerner
I supported Trump from jump street unlike you
You must be very weak to be unable to own mistakes here
Pitiful
A lot of folks here know me I doubt your lie got past many
I think since I know you’re dying to know this is what I would have liked to have seen in America 1-6-21
That tens of millions of us should have hit the streets
Big as we could get it
Something between Ghandi and Bastille Day which is a lot of room
This worked when we fought income tax in Nashville 20 years ago
Making shit up here is such poor form
So instead of denying the fact that you support Pence, you went off on 15 disjointed one sentence paragraphs on everything from jump street, Ghandi, Bastille Day to Nashville.
I ask again - What then hell is wrong with you?
Good catch! 🤜👊🤛
With Six You Get Eggroll
Books tend to be money-laundering schemes among the crooked- class.
If you have proof I supported Pence in his decision to certify
Please produce it
Tks
I’m arguably freeper least likely to have done so
Do you believe Pence did the right and constitutional thing in certifying the electors?
😜
Negative Ghost Rider.
bump
lol. Maybe he should change his handle to “Honesty2nd” but maybe the one he already uses serves as a warning.
Apparently he’s counting on people here not knowing your history.
No and I’ve never said such I thing
I’m a bigger Trump supporter than you and not nearly as woke as I’ve seen you exhibit over sensitive crap here
You’re deflecting
I see folks like you here from time to time
I’m hardly a Republican
I don’t see them as historically all that frankly
Trump I like
He fights
"But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.Corruption festers and grows if action against it is not taken. You fingers in your ears saying blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, doesn't cut it."Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.
"On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.
"At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.
"The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally. "In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.
"We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission's findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.
"Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given' and ‘lawfully certified' (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.
"We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise. But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit-conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20-would dramatically improve Americans' faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.
"These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy."
Georgia!
More than 550,000 Georgians used nearly 300 drop boxes across 112 counties, out in the open unguarded with 24/7 access for six weeks.
The legal signature matching was abolished by judicial consent decree to resolve a lawsuit against the executive branch with no legislative oversight, for mail in and drop box voter verification on ballots, along with in person voter ID verification ignored which allowed individuals to vote multiple times.
After the vote counting was completed voting materials were shredded to block the proper chain of custody instead of archived as State Law required, yet their excuse was that the only things shredded were counting notes and scribbles. In reality they destroyed such items as the signed ballot envelopes and valid ballots that had been replaced with fraudulent facsimiles.
If 100 people are murdered and all evidence is spirited away is it OK to ignore the crime?
Georgia!
More than 550,000 Georgians used nearly 300 drop boxes across 112 counties, out in the open unguarded with 24/7 access for six weeks.
The legal signature matching was abolished by judicial consent decree to resolve a lawsuit against the executive branch with no legislative oversight, for mail in and drop box voter verification on ballots, along with in person voter ID verification ignored which allowed individuals to vote multiple times.
After the vote counting was completed voting materials were shredded to block the proper chain of custody instead of archived as State Law required, yet their excuse was that the only things shredded were counting notes and scribbles. In reality they destroyed such items as the signed ballot envelopes and valid ballots that had been replaced with fraudulent facsimiles.
If 100 people are murdered and all evidence is spirited away is it OK to ignore the crime?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.