Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd; PJ-Comix

Well it took me about five minutes to find the evidence that your claim that Comix post was “BS” was in fact BS itself

Your welcome

——————-

mericanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: Hostage
Name one state that didn’t follow that state’s legal procedure to certify their electoral ballots.

Name one state where the legislature went into session and formally voted to rescind that state’s certification of electoral ballots.

Pence is correct. The U.S. Constitution gives the VP/Senate President only one power when it comes to electoral ballots. The Constitution says the VP opens the envelopes containing the ballots and hands them to ‘tellers’ to count (tellers being two members each of the House and Senate). That’s it. Not a single word about the VP rejecting ballots or doing anything else with the ballots.

The power to reject ballots once they reach Congress lies with Congress. The Constitution says Congress as a whole can vote to reject a ballot. That’s the only way electoral ballots get rejected.

The Federalist Society has a motto that says in part to do ‘what the law says, not what it should say’. In this case Pence is correct about the duties of the VP as far as electoral ballots. If anyone sees anything in the Constitution that says otherwise, please cut and paste and post here on FR.

9 posted on 11/7/2021, 7:24:56 AM by Roadrunner383
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: Hostage
Pence is dead in the water.....too many Trump supporters

——————

To: ClearCase_guy
That’s speculative. We’ve had close elections before and no vice president has ever singlehandedly sent back the results. If Pence had done so it would have established a precedent for the next time, when Democrats might have that power — it didn’t outright tear the country apart.

35 posted on 11/7/2021, 8:28:53 AM by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

—————-


16 posted on 01/08/2024 8:42:05 AM PST by wardaddy (I have seen true anti semitism is more common in USA than I imagined. A disease in the public mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy

Yeah. Thanks for posting. I had you in mind when I wrote about Freepers who supported and defended Pence.

What the hell is wrong with you?


18 posted on 01/08/2024 8:52:23 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy
Name one state that didn't follow that state's legal procedure to certify their electoral ballots.

Georgia!

More than 550,000 Georgians used nearly 300 drop boxes across 112 counties, out in the open unguarded with 24/7 access for six weeks.

The legal signature matching was abolished by judicial consent decree to resolve a lawsuit against the executive branch with no legislative oversight, for mail in and drop box voter verification on ballots, along with in person voter ID verification ignored which allowed individuals to vote multiple times.

After the vote counting was completed voting materials were shredded to block the proper chain of custody instead of archived as State Law required, yet their excuse was that the only things shredded were counting notes and scribbles.   In reality they destroyed such items as the signed ballot envelopes and valid ballots that had been replaced with fraudulent facsimiles.

If 100 people are murdered and all evidence is spirited away is it OK to ignore the crime?

35 posted on 01/08/2024 4:25:07 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy
Name one state that didn't follow that state's legal procedure to certify their electoral ballots.

Georgia!

More than 550,000 Georgians used nearly 300 drop boxes across 112 counties, out in the open unguarded with 24/7 access for six weeks.

The legal signature matching was abolished by judicial consent decree to resolve a lawsuit against the executive branch with no legislative oversight, for mail in and drop box voter verification on ballots, along with in person voter ID verification ignored which allowed individuals to vote multiple times.

After the vote counting was completed voting materials were shredded to block the proper chain of custody instead of archived as State Law required, yet their excuse was that the only things shredded were counting notes and scribbles.   In reality they destroyed such items as the signed ballot envelopes and valid ballots that had been replaced with fraudulent facsimiles.

If 100 people are murdered and all evidence is spirited away is it OK to ignore the crime?

36 posted on 01/08/2024 4:25:10 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson