Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Apparatchik
And the US military does not “repair or build new ICBMs”.

Really? You don't think maintenance is done on ICBMs?

I think there's probably an issue with some of our older weapons system that have been around for decades, where some not-often-replaced parts may be hard to restart production for.

10 posted on 01/09/2024 3:15:07 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (Either you will rule. Or you will be ruled. There is no other choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: SauronOfMordor
The phony article says “repair or build” Try working with that.
13 posted on 01/09/2024 3:24:14 AM PST by Apparatchik (Русские свиньи, идите домой!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SauronOfMordor

Same issue with NASA. They had to build a different engine for the Artemis booster because it was impossible to find enough highly-skilled technicians to build the F-1 engine again. We have definitely lost the generation of competent, motivated, dedicated machinists, welders, and electricians.


30 posted on 01/09/2024 4:23:10 AM PST by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Strange that a man with his wealth would have to resort to prostitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SauronOfMordor
"I think there's probably an issue with some of our older weapons system that have been around for decades, where some not-often-replaced parts may be hard to restart production for."

In the case of ICBMs, Lockheed-Martin will have the plans and can restart production if necessary, just like Northrop-Grunman does for the Spirit and Boeing would do for their 747s. All part of the plan and the contract.

31 posted on 01/09/2024 4:23:55 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson