To: Apparatchik
And the US military does not “repair or build new ICBMs”. Really? You don't think maintenance is done on ICBMs?
I think there's probably an issue with some of our older weapons system that have been around for decades, where some not-often-replaced parts may be hard to restart production for.
10 posted on
01/09/2024 3:15:07 AM PST by
SauronOfMordor
(Either you will rule. Or you will be ruled. There is no other choice.)
To: SauronOfMordor
The phony article says “repair or build” Try working with that.
13 posted on
01/09/2024 3:24:14 AM PST by
Apparatchik
(Русские свиньи, идите домой!)
To: SauronOfMordor
Same issue with NASA. They had to build a different engine for the Artemis booster because it was impossible to find enough highly-skilled technicians to build the F-1 engine again. We have definitely lost the generation of competent, motivated, dedicated machinists, welders, and electricians.
30 posted on
01/09/2024 4:23:10 AM PST by
freedomjusticeruleoflaw
(Strange that a man with his wealth would have to resort to prostitution.)
To: SauronOfMordor
"I think there's probably an issue with some of our older weapons system that have been around for decades, where some not-often-replaced parts may be hard to restart production for."In the case of ICBMs, Lockheed-Martin will have the plans and can restart production if necessary, just like Northrop-Grunman does for the Spirit and Boeing would do for their 747s. All part of the plan and the contract.
31 posted on
01/09/2024 4:23:55 AM PST by
Hatteras
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson