Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Those attorneys walked these two fools right into a slam dunk perjury trap - delicious


12 posted on 02/23/2024 10:23:10 PM PST by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: databoss

The judge used to work under her watch! The fix is in
& he’s up for election
Kemp appointed him..nothing will happen to Fani & her boy


16 posted on 02/23/2024 11:55:57 PM PST by rainee (Trump won! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: databoss
This is what I don't get-maybe I'm not seeing it correctly.

Why did they lie about it?

I believe they were going to lose out anyway. Let's face it-they are both protected species, so even with the possibility they won't be punished because of their skin color (and they service they are doing for the Left) they could still be fired from their positions or receive some kind of demotion instead.

They deserve more, but won't get that I suspect.

So as much worse as a perjury penalty would be-why lie about it?

It seems in their protected positions in a Banana Republic, they could have expected anything from silence to a dismissal whether they said their relationship began in 2021 or 2022. the punishment would potentially be similar for either, even if, admittedly, it looks far more heinous had it begun in 2021.

Even if they said they had been fully involved in 2021, they would have never been fined money or gone to jail for what they did...they might not have even lost their license to practice law.

Granted, we can agree all of those things should have happened, fines, disbarment, or jail, but as richly as they might deserve it, it is even more egregious. It is worse because in their deliberate betrayal of their position and their profession, they used the abuse of the organs of government power for fame, fortune, and partisan malice in an attempt to destroy a political rival. And they did it to destroy this Republic.

We can recognize the punishment should have been harsh up to losing their jobs or more, but they would not have been.

Now, under oath, they are on record, in a legal proceeding, in positions of influence, testifying that they had interacted or met only three times before that.

Almost any person off the street, when given this information, would be forced to see it this way:

NORMAL PERSON THINKS: "So. Under oath, Willis and Wade said their relationship started in 2022, and they had met or interacted in a professional way only three times in 2021. Then, the phone records of the two show that during 2021, that couple made between them 2,073 voice calls and 9,792 text messages, the overwhelming majority of those phones and messages taking place during non-work hours, and happened every day of the week. And, there was a woman who testified under oath that Willis and Wade had been seeing each other since 2019. Okay, that testimony given by Willis and Wade was perjury. Done deliberately, thought out in advance. Aren't there laws against that? Shouldn't they be convicted and go to jail? Seems pretty open and shut to me.

That would be a normal person in a functioning Republic.

So the real question is: Will there be punishment for protected, privileged, government employee, law enforcement personnel who openly, and with both malice and forethought, who lied under oath?

So if they had told the truth, it would have been bad, but might have ended right there with the worst happening that they lose their jobs.

Now, even as unlikely as it is, in a normally functioning Republic, they could go to jail. They probably won't. But they could.

Perhaps that was part of their calculus and they factored it in.

But more likely, the Einsteins likely thought they could just talk their way right out of it. That is how arrorgant criminals with a high estimation of their own intelligence get caught. They just didn't even think of phone records or GPS data.

Especially with the meat of the highly publicized "2000 Mules" documentary taking place in Atlanta.

46 posted on 02/24/2024 6:51:27 AM PST by rlmorel ("The stigma for being wrong is gone, as long as you're wrong for the right side." (Clarice Feldman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson