What are you talking about???
The math is not the error -- it's the values poured into the math by "scientists" who make rash assumptions based solely on their imagination.
Such as the speed of light being a constant, etc.
values over math itself? so you are saying "it isn't in 1+1=2," but in "truth+assumptions=further assumptions" that truth exists. and yet, any scientist can tell you stars exist with a standard decay. they all act similar, as they are not living, but simple functions. again, i ask you, why would the evidence be there if the truth wasn;t there?