Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AaronInCarolina
What CBS is doing is looking for things that might tend to authenticate their documents. But a document examiner does not look for things that are consistent with a real document, they look for things that are consistent with a forgery.

CBS is simply ignoring all the evidence that points to fakery and pointing only to some minor things that might point to the document's authenticity. That is simply dishonest. The evidence that these documents are fake is beyond ANY doubt (reasonable or otherwise). The fact that there might be some evidence that points to authenticity at that point is irrelevant.

And, for instance, the possible superscript evidence that they point to is not even consistent with the documents in question. The other examples in Bush's records were not superscripts, but in line fonts.

Since Killian couldnt' type his way out of a paper bag, there is no way he could have found the small "th" font if his life depended on it. And besides, the small "th" font was not automatically superscripted. That would have had to have been done manually by rotating the return carriage 1/2 turn. There is now way he could have done that twice on the same page.

See BS.

7 posted on 09/10/2004 9:14:12 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

But look, these 200$ Bush notes have a polyesther strip! Heh.


19 posted on 09/10/2004 9:29:15 PM PDT by Bogey78O (John Kerry: Better than Ted Kennedy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson