Bunker did not have IAEA seal

10-29-04 | Cooper22

[Cooper22]

The bunker shown on the video had a padlock not a seal.Therefore, it may not beHDX/RDX...CNN duped David Kay.

[Jagman]

I love this: two new, apparent trolls playing tag team. You guys should take your show on the road! (away from here, that is!)

[I got the rope]

I love they way liberals debate.

Here...let me burn that straw-man.

[scott0347]

Hmmmmmm...... could this be a two for one?

[Former Dodger]

You can clearly see A seal, the "close-up" is not THE seal and simply added by ABC for comparison (it's in the voice over).

If this was shot right after the area was taken, why is everybody in JUST fatigues, nobody is dressed in helmets, body armor, or carries weapons. Also, wouldn't the finding of such a seal warrant contacting an officer?

Please, this proves nothing, the only way to date it is bt the MSM reps MEMORY? Yeah, that's valid. And the story about the soldier lighting a MATCH in a bunker and igniting fumes? What, no flashlight? A soldier wouldn't recognize the smell of explosives? And they were only burned? What a load of CRAP!

[trebb]

Why even bother giving it more legs by worrying about whether or not there was a "seal" on it? Before the war, we were looking at satellite images and speculating that all the Russian trucks might be moving WMD out of the area. Now, we have more reason than ever to believe that was the case - who gives a flip about a supposed "seal"? It would be just as easy to have extras of them around (due to the goodwill of the U.N. towards the Butcher of Baghdad) than it was for the DNC to forge the CBS documents...

[Preachin']

NADER 2004!

[Cooper22]

This "bunker video" will be all over the news today. We republicans have to cast doubt(truthfully) on it.The IAEA would have put one of their seals on it if it was the explosive cache that Kerry claims. We need to get out in front of this before the Sunday shows. The Rats are throwing everything they can right now to make W fight back on a lot of different fronts to trip him up...If this was "only" padlocked, then the IAEA deemed it less of an issue than a bunker with one of it's seals.Be smart freepers! We can't go into this weekend with the Libs saying this is the smoking gun.

[Use It Or Lose It]

Maybe someone should highlight the fact that the weapons inspectors wanted the explosives destroyed in 1995 and HANS BLIX refused to do it.

Just a thought...is it possible our military dispersed the stuff out in the desert?

[Fenris6]

"worrying about whether or not there was a 'seal' on it?"

Worse, every bunker had ventillation shafts that were accesible to looters, etc. The IAEA is such a joke. Imagine the following insteraction with your local Police:

Officer: "Sir, we have a warrant to search your house for drugs"

Me: "Fine, but come back tommorrow, okay?"

Officer: "er....okay"

(next day)

Officer: "We're back to serve our searh warrant"

Me: "Fine, but you can't go into the bedroom, okay?"

Officer: "er...okay. But we're going to put a seal on the *front* door so nothing leaves your house"

Me: "whatever..."

---

Can you believe that Kerry wants to trust these bozos to protect our cities from being nuked? LOL. It would be hillarious if it wasn't so frightening.

[Peltast]

This whole story is nuts. Aren't some US Soldiers now claiming that they disposed of over 200 tons of material? And now Ted Koppel (who was embedded) says that there were no explosives there when they first rolled in.

The confusion in this story should simply reaffirm what I've already suspected about the media: They don't merely have an agenda, they're also incompetent.