[OldSmaj]

I saw one of those checkout line rags the other day that had pictures of so-called celebrities without makeup on.

She was one of them.

That is one nasty..., uh, person without all the pancake on.

Even with it on, she's pretty nasty.

And for all you old lechers out there that will come back and insist that she's God's gift to mankind, just remember the old saw about beauty being skin deep.

Oh, yeah, the pic of Kirstie Alley had nothing to do with makeup.

Besides, it would take a few tons of industrial strength makeup to cover up that huge posterior.

Bleccch!

[RockinRight]

Pam Anderson isn't all that, really. She's below average without makeup and is not aging well--without makeup she looks older than her actual age which I think is mid-30s.

[F16Fighter]

"I saw one of those checkout line rags the other day that had pictures of so-called celebrities without makeup on.

She was one of them.

That is one nasty..., uh, person without all the pancake on.

Even with it on, she's pretty nasty."

Pamela Anderson may be a clueless bimbo, but "nasty" is not what comes to mind even without make-up.

[monday]

"I saw one of those checkout line rags ................
..........Even with it on, she's pretty nasty"

hmmm.... spoken like a jealous middle aged housewife;^)

[calex59]

Hey, Kirstie was a good looking woman when she was younger. So she aged up and got fat, like that has never happened to anyone before! What a jerk. What has Kirstie done to you?