I realize you are just a troll, but for the sake of argument, I will show how ridiculous your remarks are.
"I am absolutely outraged and believe the entire bush and blair administrations need to be put in shackles and tried for war crimes in the Hague."
The OP hasn't really made any accusation. Simply stating that "Bush is a bad guy." wouldn't cut it on the floor of the house of Representatives, and it shouldn't cut it here.
" Impeachment should begin in the US immediately for bush, cheney and most of their cabinet."
Once again, the main problem with our troll's statement, is that there is not a significant harm presented. What is GWB doing to hurt the United States? That is where most liberals draw a blank. Some of them will remark that soldiers die in Iraq everyday, but this too doesn't really support the Left's position. I could make the same argument regarding the nation's highways. As a matter of fact the problem with deaths on our highways is a far worse problem than the problems that many on the left drone on about. The point remains, is that if liberal law makers are going to be held to the same standard on all political fronts -domestic and foreign- they ought to be fighting much harder for improvements on our highway system, rather than a war that has produced less than 2000 casualties in two years. (0.000006% of population for Iraq, and because 42,000 people died on America's highways in 2002,
http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/healthmedical/a/aacrashdeaths.htm we get 0.0004% on our highways.) The math is really simple:
0.000006%<0.0004%. If deaths in Iraq are the only reason that liberals can come up with for immediately exiting Iraq, they are practically drowning in their own hypocrisy.
"These outrageous, deadly actions makes Watergate seem insignificant."
This is another favorite of the left. When all else fails compare GWB to Richard Nixon. Essentially the left says: "We are still carrying this 40-year-old grudge, and we have no intention of giving up on it." The OP brings up "deadly actions." When I see this my reaction is very similar to my last response: More people die in domestic *accidents* every year than have died over seas in the last decade or so.
" Everyone in CONGRESS who has supported the bush administration over the lies and deceptions of the illegitimate Iraq War should resign immediately or also face impeachment."
While I do agree that Jonathan Forbes Kerry ought to resign his office in the Senate, I cannot agree that every supporter of the war in Iraq ought to resign. The point is, is that even if you don't believe that WMDs are overseas in the hands of terrorists and rogue nations, we have done something very good for the common good (as much as I hate to use the words "common good," I use it for lack of a better term.)Also, it seems kind of redundant that a majority of congressmen should impeach themselves. The Congress is not going to suddenly say "oops we screwed up" (they didn't screw up, but that's aside the point,)"let's impeach ourselves."
"bush and his administration and blair and his administration should also be tried along with Sadam."
I'm curious what charges you would bring GWB and Tony Blair up on. I know what I'd charge "SADDAM" for (genocide,) but I don't think you could get the same charge to stick on either the U.S. or U.K. administrations.
"Does the United States House of Representatives need anything further to begin impeachment proceedings against this guy?"
Yes. They need to know what they are going to charge him for.
"Democratic Congressmen should bring it's proceedings to a halt until this question is answered, because since it is clear that Bush is a criminal and treasonous traitor, how can this country afford one more day of him?"
The grammar of this sentence is absolutely aberrant. Let me fix it for you:
"Democratic Congressmen should bring Congressional proceedings to a halt until this question is answered. It is clear that Bush is clearly a treasonous traitor. This country cannot afford another day with him in office."
In response, it is a very dangerous thing for Congress to halt all of its proceedings. This is partially because I understand that Democratic higher-ups had agreed not to halt progress in the legislature. Treason is defined as aiding and abetting the enemy in the United States Constitution. I can't agree that GWB has been doing any such thing. If you want to lock GWB up for treason, you need to lock up Michael Moore, Howard Dean, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, William Clinton, Terry McAuliffe, Al Franken, and Tom Daschle before you even think of locking up GWB. You characterize George Bush as a villain. Au Contraire (French for "on the contrary") George Bush is a Hero.
"And if the MSM attempts to let him off the hook yet again, then each of these corporate heads should be investigated for complicity in Bush's crimes."
So, do you suppose the media ought to have more weight in judicial processes than the courts? That is a direct contradiction of the Constitution. Many people argue in favor for a separation of Church and State, I am in favor of a separation of State and Media.
"Period. No more talk."
I find it funny that you say this, and then go down to the next little part an write even more.
"We need to band together and get to the bottom of this."
I think you came to the wrong website. You might try DemonRaticUnderground.
"This should enrage every good hearted American who loves the truth and freedom."
I agree. This does enrage me. I'm glad that you just got zotted, or I might have had to take more serious action. Props to the mods.
"Do you have the courage to stand up for what is right?"
I just did.
"Or do you like sheep like to be lead and lied too by your leaders?"
Don't beg the question. This is like walking up to someone and asking them if they still rob banks.