Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Government's Sick War on Marijuana
http://tx.mpp.org ^ | 7 21 06 | Jim Hightower

Posted on 07/25/2006 1:08:16 AM PDT by freepatriot32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-185 last
To: robertpaulsen
Your petulant "I want" -- says it all.

You want a radical big "L" libertarian to argue with? - Ping one up. --

But in any case, you can expect comments on your anti-libertarian agit-prop. Demanding that others "butt out" is childish.
181 posted on 08/05/2006 6:48:18 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
I'm saying that one's right to not have the sight of public masturbation inflicted on one

So you're saying that a Libertarian would support a law banning offensive behavior? How would your Libertarian justify this?

Your post #171 didn't ask about Libertarians. I wouldn't be a bit surprised to learn of Libertarians who support a law banning public masturbation, and who justify it on the same basis as they justify their support for laws regulating tire-burning.

182 posted on 08/05/2006 9:31:31 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
I directed my question to post #69. You decided to butt in and then attempted to change the discussion to burning tires. Why? Because you're a worthless troll.

If you insist on being part of the debate, AND if you have anything to add to the subject, feel free to answer my original question. How would such a Libertarian justify it?

If you don't know, don't respond.

183 posted on 08/05/2006 10:35:29 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
feel free to answer my original question. How would such a Libertarian justify it?

Your question has been answered repeatedly. Amusingly, you will not not accept this reality, and insist that a proper Big "L" libertarian would make, - what, -- a 'proper' answer that you could shoot down with conventional knowledge?

If you don't know, don't respond.

We do 'know' -- and we will respond, whether you like it or not.

184 posted on 08/05/2006 11:02:45 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
I directed my question to post #69.

That's a falsehood; your post #171 made no mention of that other post.

You decided to butt in and then attempted to change the discussion to burning tires.

That's another falsehood; I added burning tires but in no way ignored or drove out the subject of public masturbation.

You couldn't make an honest post if your life depended on it, could you?

185 posted on 08/05/2006 12:13:53 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-185 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson