Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dirt flies across Texas over controversial highway plan
Waco Tribune-Herald ^ | October 1, 2006 | from staff reports

Posted on 10/01/2006 7:49:34 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

About 30 opponents of Gov. Rick Perry’s controversial Trans-Texas Corridor plan for superhighways statewide rallied at the McLennan County Courthouse Saturday morning, waving plastic bags of soil and vowing to resist any efforts involving eminent domain to seize their land for highway construction.

“This is a little piece of my land,” Riesel rancher and farmer Robert Cervenka said. “And this is all they’re going to get from me without a fight.”

Although some of those gathered at the steps of the courthouse were allied with independent gubernatorial candidate Carole Keeton Strayhorn, others said they were for any political force capable of jettisoning Perry from office and derailing his Trans-Texas Corridor toll road plan.

The rally was one of about 40 mounted across the state Saturday, largely coordinated through Strayhorn’s campaign.

The candidate chose to make appearances in Gonzales and at the Alamo because of their significance in Texas’ battle for independence.

Perry spokesman Robert Black says Strayhorn needs to tell Texans what she will do to meet the fierce traffic demand on Texas’ current highways, saying her calls for transportation revenue bonds and expanding Interstate 35 are too expensive.

Proposed by Perry in 2002 to accommodate the state’s projected trade and population growth, the massive corridor would cut across Texas from the Mexican border to Oklahoma. The plan has drawn fire for what some believe would be its displacement of farmland, its funding as a toll road and the choice of a Spanish company to develop it.

A group favoring the corridor project, Texans for Safe Reliable Transportation, issued a statement Saturday reminding motorists that nearly half of all Texans live within 50 miles of Interstate 35 and that “current traffic nightmares along Interstate 35 are projected to get worse if additional road capacity is not built.”

Texas’ population is expected to grow 65 percent in the next 25 years, the group said, while road use is projected to increase 214 percent. Unless Texans change their approach to transportation, road capacity will grow by only 6 percent, the statement said.

“Texas is growing, and our transportation system must grow too,” TSRT chairman Joe Krier said. “Good roads positively impact all aspects of our lives. Texans should know that the alternative to not building the Trans-Texas Corridor is more gridlock, outrageously higher gas taxes and solutions that will take years longer to deliver.

“Opponents of the Trans-Texas Corridor offer no meaningful solutions,” Krier said.

Area Republican activist Dot Snyder, who has property in Coryell County, acknowledged at the local protest Saturday morning the dangerous congestion on I-35 but said Perry’s plan, including the upheaval it would cause Texans in the form of land grabs and toll roads, carries too high a price.

“There are just bound to be better solutions,” she said. “If Gov. Perry’s plan is so good, why doesn’t he put it up for a vote of the people?”

Also during the local rally, Hallsburg Mayor Mike Glockzin faulted area politicians who say they oppose the corridor plan but refused to cross party lines Saturday to show solidarity with protesters. He said such politicians “need to grow a backbone.”

The McLennan County Commissioners Court has condemned the Trans-Texas Corridor as a threat to rural Central Texas, but none of the commissioners attended Saturday’s rally.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: blackhelicopters; bushatemyhomework; carolestrayhorn; cintra; cintrazachry; cuespookymusic; dirt; eminentdomain; grandma; i35; ih35; interstate35; landowners; onetoughgrandma; protests; rickperry; ruhrohraggy; texas; transtexascorridor; ttc; ttc35; tx; txdot; waaawaaa; zachry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
County residents stage Corridor protest

By BRAD KELLAR

Herald-Banner Staff

GREENVILLE — There weren’t very many protesters, but they all brought their sacks of dirt.

About a half-dozen area residents met outside of the Hunt County Courthouse Saturday morning, as part of the “Hands Across the Corridor” protest, designed to show opposition to the Trans-Texas Corridor project.

Each carried the “cup full of dirt” organizers of the event, who also are supporting the campaign of independent candidate Carole Keeton Strayhorn for governor, asked them to bring.

Similar demonstrations were scheduled Saturday morning at county courthouses all along the proposed route of the Corridor.

The Trans-Texas Corridor was originated by Governor Rick Perry as a method to help relieve traffic congestion along Interstate 35.

While they were a little dismayed to find they were the only ones there, the protesters nonetheless felt they had a message that needed to get out.

“I don’t think it is going to go through the governor’s ranch,” said Richard Schauer, who lives near Caddo Mills.

“That’s where we ought to put it,” added Mary Strickland, who lives in Leonard.

Officials with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) have announced construction on the project could begin by 2011.

Maps released Thursday show the current preferred route of the roadway starting near Gainesville in Cooke County, then heading southeast through northeast Collin County. As the path veers back southwest, the eastern edge of the possible route passes through Caddo Mills, taking in the Municipal Airport, while the western edge passes just to the east of Copeville.

The breadth of the proposed route would then pass through Rockwall County as it heads further south, crossing through Royse City and the McLendon-Chisholm communities with the western edge nudging the east side of the Rockwall City limits.

The Trans-Texas Corridor would include separate lanes for passenger vehicles and large trucks, along with freight railways, high-speed commuter railways and infrastructure for utilities, covering a path up to 1,200 feet wide.

Cintra-Zachry, a Spanish-American consortium, is partnering with the State of Texas to develop the first segments of the corridor. The consortium is contributing $7.2 billion, in exchange for getting to operate the first parts of the corridor.

The protesters handed out information from Corridor Watch, a group which is helping lead the fight against the project. There was the question of what to do with the dirt, however.

“It started off as bring a cup, then my wife pulled up on the Internet and it said to bring a cup of dirt in a bag,” Schauer said. “It is trying to say, ‘This is all you are going to get’.”


First phase of [TTC-35] project goes on as environment studies, public debate continue (09/30/06)

Staff Report

Despite seemingly overwhelming opposition from Mr. and Mrs. Average Joe Texan, master development plans continue for the first phase of Trans-Texas Corridor 35 with possible construction beginning by 2011, according to a release issued Thursday by the Texas Department of Transportation.

Any final alignment of TTC-35 would be determined only after public input and the completion of rigorous environmental impact studies conducted by TxDOT and the Federal Highway Administration but Cintra Zachry, a consortium led by Spanish and Texas firms, is continuing to develop its plan for construction and management of the massive road project. In 2004, Cintra Zachry identified a plan to relieve congestion on U.S. Interstate 35 by investing $6 billion to build a state-owned toll road from east of San Antonio to the Dallas/Fort Worth area and to pay the state $1.2 billion for the investment opportunity.

The Texas Transportation Commission authorized TxDOT staff to enter into discussions with Cintra Zachry to produce a master development and financial plan. Work on the plan has been ongoing separately, but parallel to, the environmental process.

“What the public is seeing,” said Michael Behrens, TxDOT executive director, “is an environmental process that runs in tandem with a separate planning process. The private developer assumes a great deal of risk this way but the ultimate benefit to drivers is that the project is delivered sooner. In the past, environmental studies and detailed planning were performed sequentially, adding years to major projects. I firmly believe the public knows and appreciates it when we move faster on our projects.”

A two-tiered environmental study and public input in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act are ongoing. These studies will determine if and where TTC-35 is built.

The master development plan takes into account issues covered to date in the environmental study, but the plan will change as the environmental study proceeds and as project development continues, according to state transportation officials.

TxDOT is currently reviewing comments and input gathered at 54 public hearings this summer along the I-35 corridor. The comments will be addressed in a report to the FHWA, which is expected to determine next summer if studies for TTC-35 will continue to a second phase, or Tier Two level. It is anticipated that it could be four years before a final alignment for TTC-35 could be approved by FHWA.


For more articles on or mentioning the Trans-Texas Corridor and the associated Saturday protests, check out

Google

Dogpile

1 posted on 10/01/2006 7:49:36 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B-Chan; barkeep; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


2 posted on 10/01/2006 7:50:26 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Texas’ population is expected to grow 65 percent in the next 25 years

No it won't if ICE would deport about half the state and enforce current laws.

3 posted on 10/01/2006 7:59:40 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Does any one have a map of the proposed route? I am interested (against) this on many levels.

Thanks


4 posted on 10/01/2006 8:17:47 AM PDT by Hazcat (Live to party, work to afford it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat
Check out Keep Texas Moving and TxDOT. You should find something in there.
5 posted on 10/01/2006 8:20:24 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat
There's a map here, but my understanding is that the final route is yet to be determined.
6 posted on 10/01/2006 8:23:09 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I notice that you live in Maryland. Mind if I ask why you are so involved in a Texas problem? Is Maryland where this giant road will eventually end up?


7 posted on 10/01/2006 8:27:35 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat

More and more people are lining up against this. I know i am.


8 posted on 10/01/2006 8:28:49 AM PDT by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks! It looks like a perfect high speed access route for illeagals from Loredo to the Akansas boarder. Can't see this as much of a help to traffic. (other than from San Antionio to Dallas). Only use I can see is as part of the Canada, USA Mexico Union deal I've heard discussed. (another bad/scary idea).


9 posted on 10/01/2006 8:28:55 AM PDT by Hazcat (Live to party, work to afford it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

BTTT


10 posted on 10/01/2006 8:30:03 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat

So let me ask you . . . if we do not build this highway, the illegals will not come? LOL


11 posted on 10/01/2006 8:30:19 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is; Why have it? Will make it easier for crossing boarder. Won't do much for traffic (as a part of the transportation industry I know a little about this). Part of 'North American Union' talk?

Now do you understand?


12 posted on 10/01/2006 8:34:07 AM PDT by Hazcat (Live to party, work to afford it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

"Don't be messin' with my CASH COW!", said Riesel farmer Robert Cervenka, as he cashed his ag subsidy check for $37,871.00.


13 posted on 10/01/2006 8:34:08 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat

Yes, I understand now. Expanding a highway that is already congested will do nothing for legal traffic, but make it easier for illegal traffic. Part of the NAU conspiracy to subvert our government.


14 posted on 10/01/2006 8:38:03 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

I'm just interested in the TTC, since I'm a bit of a highway buff, and this thing is basically the mother of all highway projects, only surpassed by the Interstate Highway System.


15 posted on 10/01/2006 8:53:07 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.

bump.


16 posted on 10/01/2006 8:57:55 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Thanks for the reply. I am interested too. We have 2 pieces of property, one in Brazoria County near the coast that will not be affected. The other one is on the south side of Ft.Worth. The Brazoria co. piece is just ranch land but the Ft.Worth property is a manufacturing plant that would be difficult and expensive to move.
17 posted on 10/01/2006 9:22:53 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


18 posted on 10/01/2006 10:31:59 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
What's also interesting are the comments on the article at the Waco Trib site. They're indicative of the sentiment in this part of the state. There are four main areas of objection:

The plan is a multi-billion dollar project financed with government loans going to a foreign firm. Somebody's pocketing an absolute friggin fortune out of this.

This is killing Perry in the rural parts of the state, which are normally Republican strongholds. The resentment of Perry right now is palpable. Central Texans feel invaded by illegals already, and the concept of taking land to turn over to a foreign company has them furious. The only reason Perry's not running second is because Kinky and One Nutty Grandma are splitting the anti-Perry vote.

The proposed cost of using the corridor will be $15 to take a one way trip from Waco to Austin (100 miles) and nearly $100 for a big truck.

A lot of people in Texas are becoming convinced that the Perry wing of the Texas GOP doesn't give a d*mn about Texas, but simply wants to advance the unified North American Continent, eliminating countries.

I still think Perry will hang on, but if One Nutty Grandma dropped out, I think Kinky would take it. If Kinky dropped out, I think the Rat would. However, Perry is topped out at 35% of the vote, because 1/3rd of the state will never vote Republican, and another third will never vote Democrat, but will also never vote for Perry.

19 posted on 10/01/2006 11:23:43 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (The most important thing is sincerity. Once you can fake that, everything else is easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat

http://www.keeptexasmoving.com/pdfs/projects/ttc35/master_development_plan/Chapter_2_Universe_of_Facililities.pdf

Scroll down to page 2-4 in this particular part of the document to see a border-to-border map of the latest proposed route. More detailed maps follow on succeeding pages.

TxDOT released a 1600 page document late last week, which takes time and dogged determination to decipher and wade through it.

I am dogged and determined.


20 posted on 10/01/2006 12:00:48 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson