To: admin
I would appreciate an explanation as to why the original piece on this exact subject, written by Mr. Medved, remains in the News/Activism section of Free Republic, as shown here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1759457/posts
while you have seen fit to immediately, MOVE Mr. Corsi's rebuttal to Chat?
6 posted on
01/02/2007 1:46:30 PM PST by
Kimberly GG
(PATRIOTS MARCH TO "TAKE BACK AMERICA" (www.lframerica.com ))
To: Kimberly GG
Belongs in the Smoky Back Room, under "humor."
20 posted on
01/02/2007 2:14:55 PM PST by
Petronski
(I just love that woman.)
To: Kimberly GG; admin
You might do better to address your complaint to Admin Moderator - "admin" would appear to be just another user (to whom courtesy ping).
37 posted on
01/02/2007 3:25:01 PM PST by
Xenalyte
(Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)
To: Kimberly GG
To: Kimberly GG
I would appreciate an explanation as to why the original piece on this exact subject, written by Mr. Medved, remains in the News/Activism section of Free Republic My guess is that your addition of "(Corsi's Response)" might have disqualified you from the News section. Did you ever get a reply from a responsible party?
To: Kimberly GG
I don't know anout you, but I'll wait until that other movie critic and expert political analyst Roger Ebert to weigh in (no pun intended) with his views on the SPP/NAU.
I'm sure I will give just as much credence to him as I do Medved.
66 posted on
01/05/2007 3:38:43 PM PST by
ActionNewsBill
("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson