Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Erectile Dysfunction Waxes and Wanes (exercise improves sex life...who'd athunk)
Medpagetoday.com ^ | 1/17/2006 | Neil Osterweil

Posted on 01/18/2007 7:32:13 AM PST by Dark Skies

Instead of popping pills, men with erectile dysfunction may be able to improve their performance through weight loss and getting in shape, but long-term cigarette smokers may be out of luck.

Action Points

* Explain to patients who ask that weight loss may improve symptoms of erectile dysfunction, while smoking doubles the risk that erectile dysfunction will progress in severity. Other common risk factors for erectile dysfunction include aging, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

That's the conclusion of investigators in the ongoing Massachusetts Male Aging Study, who found that changing some modifiable risk factors may reverse or prevent the progression of erectile dysfunction.

"The lack of knowledge about prognosis following erectile dysfunction onset may have created the impression that remission of symptoms through nonpharmacological treatment, a path many patients prefer, is not possible," Thomas G. Travison, Ph.D., of the New England Research Institutes here, and colleagues, wrote in the January issue of the Journal of Urology.

"The results presented here, by contrast, suggest that erectile dysfunction severity following onset is influenced by modifiable factors," they wrote.

The findings suggest that a significant number of men experience the ebb and flow of erectile dysfunction remission and progression, and point to possible non-drug approaches to coping with the condition.

The authors found that body mass index was associated with remission and progression of erectile dysfunction, while smoking, age and health status were associated with progression of impotence. Smoking doubled the risk for progression of erectile dysfunction, a magnitude of effect similar to that of aging.

The investigators looked at data on 401 men with some degree of erectile function at baseline who were part of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, a longitudinal follow-up study of 1,709 men who ranged in age from 40 to 70 at study enrollment in 1987-89.

The investigators evaluated data only from the enrollment period and from the first interim follow-up at about the nine-year mark (1995-97) to avoid potential confounding from the widespread use of Viagra (sildenafil, approved in 1998), and other phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.

They analyzed the data to determine the severity of erectile dysfunction at initial presentation of symptoms, and used logistic regression to estimate the odds of the progression and/or remission in association with variable factors.

The variables included demographics, BMI, co-morbidities, lifestyle factors, frequency of sexual intercourse, and satisfaction with recent sexual experiences. They also evaluated self-reported medical history, depression, current smoking status, alcohol consumption, education, marital status, household income, hours of sleep per day, physical activities, diet, and general health status.

They found that remission of erectile dysfunction occurred in 141 of the 401 men (35%) studied (95% confidence interval, 30%-40%). Of the 323 men who were determined to have had minimal or moderate erectile dysfunction at baseline, 107 (33%, 95% CI 28%-38%) had progression of dysfunction.

Of the 78 men who had complete erectile at baseline, 45 (58%) still had complete dysfunction at follow-up.

In the logistic regression analysis, age and body mass index were associated with progression and remission, while smoking and self-assessed health status were associated with progression only.

The odds ratio for erectile dysfunction progression in the multivariate model was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.6-3.3, P<0.001). The odds ratio for smoking was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.16-3.68, P=0.01).

The lack of association between smoking and disease regression suggests that the damage to erectile function from cigarettes, once manifest, may not be reversible, the authors implied.

They also found that comorbidities and demographic factors other than age had little or no association with ED progression or remission when age effects were controlled for.

"Likewise, measures of sexual satisfaction were not predictive. Sexual desire displayed a significant age adjusted association with progression, but was also strongly associated with general health and BMI and, therefore, was not significant in multivariate models," they wrote.

They said the association of body mass index with remission and progression, plus the association of smoking and health status with progression, "offer potential avenues for facilitating remission and delaying progression using nonpharmacological intervention. The benefits of such interventions for overall men's health may be far-reaching."

Physicians can use the findings from the study as a basis for evaluation and treatment of men with erectile dysfunction, suggested Michael A. Perelman, M.S., M.Phil., Ph.D., of the departments of psychiatry, reproductive medicine, and urology at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, in an accompanying editorial comment.

"How to evaluate and when to treat are timely questions," Dr. Perelman wrote. "Developing a dialogue with patients regarding the issues surrounding sexual function is critical. Not all patients want immediate and/or exclusive pharmaceutical treatment. Conclusions from this article can be integrated into an assessment algorithm in a manner which facilitates patient compliance, and leads to increased respect and rapport between patient and urologist."

The study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the National Institute on Aging.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: bobdole; dontsmoke; ed; erectiledysfunction; sexercise
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 01/18/2007 7:32:14 AM PST by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

A Captain Obvious thread!


2 posted on 01/18/2007 7:34:27 AM PST by Tax-chick ("I don't know you, but I love who you seem to be.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

3 posted on 01/18/2007 7:35:33 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

You'd be surprised how many guys don't know that exercise has a powerful effect on one's sex life. If they did, they would get active.


4 posted on 01/18/2007 7:36:40 AM PST by Dark Skies ("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

OK so basically this group got a grant to be pecker checkers.


5 posted on 01/18/2007 7:37:47 AM PST by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
Take a pill, instant gratification which is the mantra of todays sheeple.
6 posted on 01/18/2007 7:39:34 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies; Tax-chick

I really, really want to say something here - but I think I'll be a good girl :)


7 posted on 01/18/2007 7:43:53 AM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Give it a stab.;-)


8 posted on 01/18/2007 7:44:51 AM PST by Dark Skies ("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Why do they tempt me with being suspended again
al take a deep breath and move on


9 posted on 01/18/2007 7:47:45 AM PST by al baby (Hi mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
"The lack of association between smoking and disease regression suggests that the damage to erectile function from cigarettes, once manifest, may not be reversible, the authors implied."

This is why I prefer to smoke after having sex, and not before.

10 posted on 01/18/2007 7:48:17 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Voted Free Republic's Most Eligible Bachelor: 2006. Love them Diebold machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Not to mention, not being a fat arse attracks the chicks.


11 posted on 01/18/2007 7:48:24 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

12 posted on 01/18/2007 7:48:59 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

lol...it's a safe bet that Michael Moore is a viagra abuser.


13 posted on 01/18/2007 7:50:03 AM PST by Dark Skies ("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: al baby
Erectile Dysfunction Waxes and Wanes (exercise improves sex life...who'd athunk)

Shouldn't that be: Erectile Dysfunction Rises and Falls?
14 posted on 01/18/2007 7:50:07 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; SandyInSeattle; Darksheare; OSHA; ...
It has its ups and downs.


15 posted on 01/18/2007 7:51:52 AM PST by Slings and Arrows (Tell Tom Vilsack to WEAR THE BEAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
The lack of association between smoking and disease regression suggests that the damage to erectile function from cigarettes, once manifest, may not be reversible, the authors implied.

Smokers are failures in the bedroom. Not surprising.

16 posted on 01/18/2007 7:52:47 AM PST by antismoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

I was thinking of pat morita instructing ralph machio in the art of well you know wax on wax off


17 posted on 01/18/2007 7:53:14 AM PST by al baby (Hi mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: antismoker
Smokers are failures in the bedroom. Not surprising.

Oh really? Then please explain why there were more kids born back in the 40s, 50s and 60s when more than half the population smoked and there are less being born now when only about 20% of the population smokes.........

18 posted on 01/18/2007 7:55:44 AM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

No no no..go ahead. No need to be good on FR.


19 posted on 01/18/2007 7:56:13 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: antismoker
Smokers are failures in the bedroom. Not surprising.

Actually, no. Cigars can come in quite handy as has been demonstrated.

20 posted on 01/18/2007 7:57:47 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson