Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dove Video - Campaign For Real Beauty (Amazing video of beauty makeover of woman model)
YouTube ^ | Dove

Posted on 02/16/2007 7:32:55 AM PST by rawhide

amazing video:

Dove Video - Campaign for Real Beauty


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dove; realbeauty

1 posted on 02/16/2007 7:33:00 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rawhide
I don't think there was anything wrong with the way she looked to begin with. She's pretty.


2 posted on 02/16/2007 7:38:36 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

3 posted on 02/16/2007 7:38:37 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: raybbr

I agree, I liked her smile right at the beginning, very pretty!


5 posted on 02/16/2007 8:01:58 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

She should wash her hair and face, though. Both are greasy.


6 posted on 02/16/2007 8:02:49 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rawhide; jdm
I am sure her hair and face were not washed for a reason - to make a point. However:


7 posted on 02/16/2007 8:08:02 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Perfect chiseled nose, perfect eyebrows, great hair and high cheek bones. A six year old could apply makeup to that face and viola! A perfect beauty.

Now, try that with me...
8 posted on 02/16/2007 8:32:25 AM PST by poobear (Carter & Clinton - 'The Latter Day Church Of Jew Haters & Horndogs')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
I don't think there was anything wrong with the way she looked to begin with. She's pretty.

Yeah, I saw this same video a couple of weeks ago, and that was my reaction. There wasn't anything wrong with her the way she was.
9 posted on 02/16/2007 9:05:49 AM PST by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
This is an interesting little bit that illustrates how distorted society's view of beauty is.

As I've mentioned in this thread already, I thought she was cute to begin with. I'd date her. She probably wouldn't date me, but that's not really the point.
10 posted on 02/16/2007 9:14:32 AM PST by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Can you capture and post the side by side photo shown at the beginning of the video, the before and after split? Thanks.


11 posted on 02/16/2007 9:28:52 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Before.........................................After

I did not include the digitally remastered photo. I don't think it's the same woman.

12 posted on 02/16/2007 9:38:26 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
I get it now!


13 posted on 02/16/2007 9:40:23 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

It's kind of nice to see menfolk who can tolerate us without our 'prepping' since it's really best not to go to bed with makeup on.


14 posted on 02/16/2007 9:45:03 AM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Did you watch the video? It makes the point that she looks that way at the end not just because of makeup, but because of photo imaging - the neck is lengthened, the eyes are enlarged (digitally) and the latter picture is after all of that has been done - thus creating an unrealistic picture.


15 posted on 02/16/2007 9:47:32 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Great, thank you very much!


16 posted on 02/16/2007 9:50:24 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
Did you watch the video? It makes the point that she looks that way at the end not just because of makeup, but because of photo imaging - the neck is lengthened, the eyes are enlarged (digitally) and the latter picture is after all of that has been done - thus creating an unrealistic picture.

Which is exactly why I said, "I don't think it's the same woman!"

In other words, what you said is my reasoning for not including it.

17 posted on 02/16/2007 10:14:55 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
I don't think there was anything wrong with the way she looked to begin with. She's pretty.

That's the whole point of the video. There's nothing wrong with the way she looked before all the manipulations. But now it's no longer good enough to be normal; we have a distorted idea of what's beautiful because the models and actresses around us have been tweezed, surgically sculpted, made up, lasered, and Photoshopped. Now this impossible vision is the standard. The result is that many Western women, particularly American women, feel they aren't good enough or attractive enough. In young girls who haven't learned to value themselves through talents or accomplishments, this can be damaging.

At least, that is the point of the campaign. Oh, and also that "all you need is our soap to be pretty."

18 posted on 02/16/2007 6:14:51 PM PST by Fairview (A loving mother dead and a child orphaned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson