Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/03/2007 5:42:32 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jla

ping


2 posted on 04/03/2007 5:45:53 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Fred's top asset is his stage presence, followed closely by his presidential and other executive experience... on film.

Funny how experience as a Senator is good enough for every other candidate (R) & (D) in the race, but Fred "has no real experience".

3 posted on 04/03/2007 5:46:09 AM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Lamar is wrong.

Fred’s top asset is that he is a conservative.


4 posted on 04/03/2007 5:47:52 AM PDT by Petronski (FRED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Sounds like the same mindless liberal attacks that were made against Reagan.
8 posted on 04/03/2007 5:55:26 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Years ago, Congressman and medical doctor Larry McDonald was working late in his Capitol Hill office when an old friend from medical school knocked on his door. Larry rose and greeted his guest and, after exchanging the usual pleasantries, looking a bit dejected, his friend slumped into a chair.

Larry asked him what was wrong.

With a little sigh, his friend said “Every few years, a group of us have to take time away from our practices and jobs and come all the way up here to meet with our representatives and senators to try to head off some new effort to trash the Constitution. And I often get the feeling that these guys up here just aren’t listening.”

Laughing, Larry offered, “You do know, don’t you, that there’s a better way?”

“What’s that, Larry?”

“You and your friends ought to get together at home and find a House candidates who shares your values and get behind him with support and resources and REPLACE those guys who aren’t listening. And if there is no candidate with those qualifications, go out and CREATE one – maybe even run yourself! And if, down the road, the new guy stops listening to you, work to replace HIM. The beauty of the House of Representatives is that the Founding Fathers designed it so that these folks have to come home every 24 months to get their tickets punched by the voters. And as we both know, the taxing and spending occur in the House. If the lower house refused to fund some liberty destroying or unconstitutional agency or program, it just won’t happen.”

“But, Larry, how do we convince the rest of the voters that the incumbent needs to be replaced?”

“That used to be a real challenge since poll after poll asking folks what they thought of congress usually got very negative answers. But when asked how they thought THEIR guys were doing up here got responses indicating that THEIR guys were doing a good job. There’s a new program called Tax Reform Immediately (TRIM) that uses only one yardstick for its quarterly rating of every member of congress – the United States Constitution.” (http://www.trimonline.org)

“Does it work, Larry?”

“One of my favorite stories about that is the 16 year-old paperboy out in the Midwest who every quarter paid to have 10,000 TRIM Bulletins printed and threw them on his route and in another 9,500 lawns in his district – FROM HIS BIKE! After 3 quarters of that, the incumbent was ousted for someone who more closely represented the views of the voters. On election night, the red-faced loser was interviewed on TV and, waving a TRIM Bulletin, sputtered that it was a right-wing plot to “get him.” It was GREAT TV.”

“A ‘plot’ by a 16 year-old paperboy.” Larry and his guest laughed.

“And it’s happening all over the country – even in my state, Georgia. My supporters down there are keeping the voters in the 7th informed about my votes up here. Since my only standard is the Constitution, they keep sending me back. So it works both ways: The good guys get reelected and the bad guys get sent home – or hang around as lobbyists.” Another chuckle.

“But what about the presidential election?”

“While important, if we had 300 or so decent representatives up here on the Hill, they’d take back much of the power they’ve shipped down to 1600 over the past years and the 4 year beauty contest would become far less important than it now is. A metaphor for these elections for president, representatives and senate is a 3 card Monte game: While everyone is focused on the card marked with the “P,” the “R” and “S” cards are largely ignored.”

Larry’s friend returned home, got his friends and neighbors up to speed with TRIM – and within a year, had a new and improved representative.


13 posted on 04/03/2007 5:59:12 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

So, Mia, you don’t like Hillary...but yet you don’t support the most likeable, electable conservative we have either?

Who do you support?


28 posted on 04/03/2007 6:42:17 AM PDT by RockinRight (Support FREDeralism. Fred Thompson in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Lamar is picking the right guy, but has the reasoning wrong.


39 posted on 04/03/2007 7:03:16 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (One fish, two fish, I want to go catch bluefish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Speaking of McCain, If he gets the nomination, I think his VP selection will be critical.

Have you noticed McCain lately?
I think his melanoma is back. The left side of his face appears mighty swollen to me. And his face overall is gaunt.

70 posted on 04/03/2007 7:55:40 AM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Mia T, I presume you wrote the title: “EARTH TO LAMAR: FRED THOMPSON LOOKING THE PART AIN’T ENOUGH (41-second video fries Fred)” Perhaps you need to elaborate that smear line and explain to me how idiot Lamar’s comments to Left-freakin’ Matthews fries Fred Thompson. What a strange lead line, Mia.


99 posted on 04/03/2007 12:30:30 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Thanks for the ping! Good Post!


100 posted on 04/03/2007 12:56:22 PM PDT by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

I would rather the oval office be held by an inexperienced-but-good person than by an evil person with all the experience in the world


104 posted on 04/03/2007 1:33:44 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Never try to teach a pig to sing -- it wastes your time and it annoys the pig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gracey; Politicalmom; Pox; longtermmemmory; Ol' Sparky; Fierce Allegiance; Graymatter; ...
So give us some reason to vote for Fred. He's a good man, however, He couldn't even control his own Government Committee Chairmanship, and capitulated to John Glenn, the minority man.

What did he do impressive while he was Senator? I'd like some reasons to support him.--
Gracey

 


Precisely, Gracey.

 

Back to Reality

But still. Mr. Thompson is a candidate without an exploratory committee, a campaign war chest or a full-time staff. Apart from a few close friends, Mr. Thompson has, as yet, no real inner circle and no coterie of trusted advisors guiding his campaign.

At a time when most G.O.P. Presidential hopefuls are putting as much distance as they can between themselves and the Bush administration, Mr. Thompson has made a point of fund-raising for Scooter Libby's defense fund.

And in terms of his actual policy positions, Mr. Thompson is hard to identify. He has supported drilling for oil in the Arctic, and is a supporter of gun-owners' rights. But in other ways, he takes after moderate Republican Howard Baker, his old boss on the Congressional committee that investigated Watergate.

He supported campaign-finance reform and opposed tort reform. He doesn't support gay marriage, but would still leave the issue up to the states rather than banning it outright. His position on abortion, while officially pro-life, can best be described as a work in progress.

And he supports some immigrant guest-worker programs.

It's too soon to know whether his ideological squishiness will be a problem. But given the irrelevance of actual details this far into Mr. Thompson's cinematic Presidential bid, maybe it won't matter.

"Fred Thompson--well, he's not Ronald Reagan," said Mr. Keene. "But he's done enough, and is well enough liked. He's a fallback."

The perfect role.

The Mysterious Appeal of Fred Thompson
BY REBECCA SINDERBRAND
The New York Observer


141 posted on 04/04/2007 3:51:42 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson